Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration—A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies

The aim of this systematic review was to perform a qualitative synthesis of in vitro studies which evaluate and compare the penetration of calcium silicate-based sealers into dentinal tubules. A systematic advanced search was performed in Scopus, Embase, Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane databases on the 1 December 2022. In vitro studies that compared the tubular penetration of at least two calcium silicate-based sealers in extracted human teeth were eligible. PRILE 2021 guidelines were used for the assessment of the risk of bias included studies. The search identified a total of 680 preliminary records, among which 12 studies were eligible for review. The most used methodology to evaluate sealer penetration was the use of a fluorochrome together with the tested sealers and the analysis of their penetration under confocal laser microscopy. Regarding the results of the included studies, calcium silicate-based sealers exhibit a favorable dentinal tubule penetration. Tubular penetration, however, can be affected by factors such as the irrigation protocol, sealer activation, the filling method used, and root canal morphology. EndoSequence BC Sealer showed the highest sealer penetration among the tested sealers. The influence of different fluorochromes on the results of dentinal tubule penetration studies should also be further explored. The in vitro nature of the included studies limits the applicability of the results into the clinical setting. Prospero registration: CRD42022383896

[1]  C. Llena,et al.  Scientific production on silicate-based endodontic materials: evolution and current state: a bibliometric analysis , 2022, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[2]  P. Diogo,et al.  Long-term outcome of nonvital immature permanent teeth treated with apexification and corono-radicular adhesive restoration - a case series. , 2022, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  M. Fazlyab,et al.  Comparison of bioceramic and epoxy resin sealers in terms of marginal adaptation and tubular penetration depth with different obturation techniques in premolar teeth: A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscopy study , 2022, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[4]  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva,et al.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study root canal fillings. , 2022, International endodontic journal.

[5]  Sayantan Mukherjee,et al.  Microscopic evaluation of sealer penetration and interfacial adaptation of three different endodontic sealers: An in vitro study , 2021, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[6]  J. Berlandi,et al.  Debunking the Concept of Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Sealers: Sealer Staining with Rhodamine B Fluorescent Dye Is an Inadequate Method , 2021, Materials.

[7]  P. Dummer,et al.  PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: a consensus-based development. , 2021, International endodontic journal.

[8]  C. Cáceres,et al.  Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Adaptation of Bio-C Sealer and AH-Plus: A Comparative SEM Evaluation , 2021, European endodontic journal.

[9]  Mehak Sharma,et al.  Sealer penetration in the dentinal tubules: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study , 2021 .

[10]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[11]  I. Raimundo,et al.  Heating-stability, physical and chemical analysis of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. , 2021, International endodontic journal.

[12]  G. Spagnuolo,et al.  Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration , 2021, Materials.

[13]  A. Dinçer,et al.  Investigation of the effect of different chelation solutions on penetration of resin‐based and bioceramic sealers with a novel method , 2021, Microscopy research and technique.

[14]  G. De-Deus,et al.  Impact of Warm Vertical Compaction on the Sealing Ability of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: A Confocal Microscopic Evaluation , 2021, Materials.

[15]  P. Cerri,et al.  Biocompatibility and bioactive potential of the NeoMTA Plus endodontic bioceramic-based sealer , 2020, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[16]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Comparing dentinal tubule penetration of conventional and 'HiFlow' bioceramic sealers with resin-based sealer: An in vitro study. , 2020, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[17]  R. Meidyawati,et al.  COMPARISON OF DENTINAL TUBULAR PENETRATION OF THREE BIOCERAMIC SEALERS , 2020, International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics.

[18]  M. Só,et al.  Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Using a Specific Calcium Fluorophore. , 2020, Brazilian dental journal.

[19]  J. Guerreiro-Tanomaru,et al.  Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of a New Calcium Silicate-based Sealer, Bio-C Sealer. , 2019, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  P. Tomson,et al.  The single cone obturation technique with a modified warm filler. , 2019, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  B. Karabucak,et al.  The Antimicrobial Effect of Bioceramic Sealer on an 8-week Matured Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Attached to Root Canal Dentinal Surface. , 2019, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  E. F. Iglecias,et al.  Penetration of bioceramic and epoxy-resin endodontic cements into lateral canals. , 2019, Brazilian oral research.

[23]  S. Alsubait,et al.  Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis , 2019, Odontology.

[24]  B. C. de Vasconcelos,et al.  Influence of ultrasonic agitation on bond strength, marginal adaptation, and tooth discoloration provided by three coronary barrier endodontic materials , 2019, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[25]  Yemi Kim,et al.  The Penetration Ability of Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealers into Dentinal Tubules Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study , 2019, Materials.

[26]  Sevinç Aktemur Türker,et al.  Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer , 2018, Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects.

[27]  T. Dammaschke,et al.  Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review , 2018, Odontology.

[28]  L. Friedlander,et al.  Sealer penetration and adaptation in root canals with the butterfly effect , 2018, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[29]  F. Pellen,et al.  Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study , 2018, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[30]  Y. K. Kim,et al.  An Evaluation of Wetting and Adhesion of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers to Intraradicular Human Dentin , 2018, Materials.

[31]  Jyothi Mandava,et al.  Interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of bioceramic endodontic sealers , 2018, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[32]  Dong-Yul Lee,et al.  Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal , 2018, Journal of dental sciences.

[33]  Yanmei Dong,et al.  In vitro study of dentinal tubule penetration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer , 2018, PloS one.

[34]  A. M. H. Alves,et al.  Comparison of two observational methods, scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopies, in the adhesive interface analysis of endodontic sealers to root dentine , 2018, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[35]  J. A. Duque,et al.  The effect of mixing method on tricalcium silicate-based cement. , 2018, International endodontic journal.

[36]  B. Wu,et al.  The Tubular Penetration Depth and Adaption of Four Sealers: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study , 2017, BioMed research international.

[37]  C. Bramante,et al.  Intradentinal antimicrobial action and filling quality promoted by ultrasonic agitation of epoxy resin-based sealer in endodontic obturation , 2017, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[38]  G. Jadhav,et al.  Bioceramics in endodontics – a review , 2017, Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry.

[39]  C. Llena,et al.  Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate‐based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells , 2017, International endodontic journal.

[40]  C. Viegas,et al.  Histologic Evaluation of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures with the Use of Chitosan Scaffolds in Immature Dog Teeth with Apical Periodontitis , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[41]  M. Thota,et al.  Effect of Different Irrigating Solutions on Depth of Penetration of Sealer into Dentinal Tubules: A Confocal Microscopic Study , 2017, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[42]  Ji-Wook Jeong,et al.  Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Calcium Silicate–based Root Canal Sealer with Different Obturation Methods , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[43]  R. Moraes,et al.  Are Premixed Calcium Silicate–based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[44]  H. Aksel,et al.  Effect of a Low Surface Tension Vehicle on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Hydroxide and Triple Antibiotic Paste , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[45]  S. Sauro,et al.  Innovative root-end filling materials based on calcium-silicates and calcium-phosphates , 2017, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[46]  L. Walsh,et al.  Dental Material Choices for Pulp Therapy in Paediatric Dentistry , 2017, European endodontic journal.

[47]  A. Droździk,et al.  A Comparative Chemical Study of Calcium Silicate-Containing and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers , 2016, BioMed research international.

[48]  Xue-jun Gao,et al.  Influence of Warm Vertical Compaction Technique on Physical Properties of Root Canal Sealers. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[49]  Z. A. Che Ab Aziz,et al.  Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review , 2016, International journal of biomaterials.

[50]  C. Primus,et al.  Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[51]  D. Aristizábal,et al.  Evaluation of the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers and two gutta-percha filling techniques. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[52]  H. Arslan,et al.  Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study , 2016, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[53]  H. Alhadainy,et al.  Push-out bond strength of different root canal obturation systems to root canal dentin , 2015 .

[54]  P. Laurent,et al.  Bioactivity of a Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Cement (BioRoot RCS): Interactions with Human Periodontal Ligament Cells In Vitro. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[55]  N. H. Abu Kasim,et al.  Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers. , 2015, Dental materials journal.

[56]  M. Shah,et al.  Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molar: A scanning electron microscopic study , 2015, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[57]  M. Kuga,et al.  The effect of final irrigation on the penetrability of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopy study , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[58]  W. Felippe,et al.  Adhesive interface and bond strength of endodontic sealers to root canal dentine after immersion in phosphate‐buffered saline , 2014, Microscopy research and technique.

[59]  T. Alaçam,et al.  Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[60]  M. Forghani,et al.  Effect of the smear layer on apical seals produced by two calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. , 2014, Journal of oral science.

[61]  R. Rosa,et al.  Penetrability of AH plus and MTA fillapex after endodontic treatment and retreatment: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study , 2014, Microscopy research and technique.

[62]  E. Tuna,et al.  X-ray diffraction analysis of MTA-Plus, MTA-Angelus and DiaRoot BioAggregate , 2014, European journal of dentistry.

[63]  P. Tomson,et al.  Contemporary obturation of the root canal system , 2014, BDJ.

[64]  C. Bramante,et al.  Influence of powder-to-water ratio on radiopacity, setting time, pH, calcium ion release and a micro-CT volumetric solubility of white mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2014, International endodontic journal.

[65]  A. Shamshiri,et al.  Push-out bond strength of gutta-percha with a new bioceramic sealer in the presence or absence of smear layer. , 2013, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[66]  Ya Shen,et al.  Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[67]  D. Damidot,et al.  The setting characteristics of MTA Plus in different environmental conditions. , 2013, International endodontic journal.

[68]  G. Tompkins,et al.  The butterfly effect: an investigation of sectioned roots. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[69]  B. Gomes,et al.  Evaluation of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer MTA Fillapex. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[70]  M. Duarte,et al.  Evaluation of epoxy resin sealer after three root canal filling techniques by confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2012, Microscopy research and technique.

[71]  S. Tuncer,et al.  Effect of different final irrigation solutions on dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of root canal sealer. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[72]  G. Gavini,et al.  Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[73]  F. Diemer,et al.  Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscopic study. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[74]  P. Taddei,et al.  Development of the foremost light-curable calcium-silicate MTA cement as root-end in oral surgery. Chemical-physical properties, bioactivity and biological behavior. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[75]  O. Peters,et al.  Effectiveness of the erbium:YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.

[76]  Ş. Erşahan,et al.  Dislocation resistance of iRoot SP, a calcium silicate-based sealer, from radicular dentine. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[77]  J. Gutmann,et al.  Depth and percentage of penetration of endodontic sealers into dentinal tubules after root canal obturation using a lateral compaction technique: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[78]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[79]  E. Alfredo,et al.  ADHESION OF AN ENDODONTIC SEALER TO DENTIN AND GUTTA-PERCHA: SHEAR AND PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH MEASUREMENTS AND SEM ANALYSIS , 2009, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[80]  S. Paris,et al.  Correlation of scanning electron and confocal laser scanning microscopic analyses for visualization of dentin/adhesive interfaces in the root canal. , 2009, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[81]  N. Silikas,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[82]  C. Poggio,et al.  Solubility of root-end-filling materials: a comparative study. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[83]  T. Watson,et al.  The penetration of RealSeal primer and Tubliseal into root canal dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopic study. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[84]  M. Sousa-Neto,et al.  A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH PlusTM and EpiphanyTM root canal sealants , 2006 .

[85]  R. Love,et al.  An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[86]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Effect of polymerization shrinkage on the sealing capacity of resin fillers for endodontic use. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[87]  H. Messer,et al.  Effect of obturation technique on sealer cement thickness and dentinal tubule penetration. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[88]  C. Stavrianos,et al.  The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by three different root canal sealers: an in vitro study. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[89]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. , 2001, Dental Materials.

[90]  I A Mjör,et al.  The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[91]  P R Wesselink,et al.  Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[92]  J A Planell,et al.  Setting Reaction and Hardening of an Apatitic Calcium Phosphate Cement , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[93]  L. Crum,et al.  Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.

[94]  H Schilder,et al.  Filling root canals in three dimensions. , 1967, Dental clinics of North America.

[95]  Differences in Penetration of Two Types of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers with Ultrasonic Activation into Dentinal Tubules , 2022, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.