Phasic heart rate responses to performance feedback in a time production task: effects of information versus valence

This study examined the cardiac concomitants of feedback processing in a time production task derived from [Mittner et al., J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9 (1997) 788]. Participants performed the time production task (i.e. 1-s intervals) under two conditions. In the experimental condition, feedback informed them that the produced interval was within or outside the acceptable range (too long or too short). In the other, yoked-control, condition feedback was unrelated to the actual estimate. The performance findings indicated that in the experimental condition, participants tended to adjust the new interval in the direction indicated by the feedback. In the control condition, however, the adjustments were largely unrelated to the information provided by the feedback. Heart rate slowed to feedback stimuli indicating that the estimate was outside the acceptable range. Surprisingly, cardiac slowing did not discriminate between experimental and control conditions. This finding seems to suggest that heart rate is sensitive to the valence rather than the information provided by the feedback. This finding is discussed vis-à-vis current neuroimaging and psychophysiological studies of performance monitoring.

[1]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[2]  E. Donchin,et al.  Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Maurits W. van der Molen,et al.  Cardiac timing and the central regulation of action , 2002, Psychological research.

[4]  F. Vidal,et al.  Is the ‘error negativity’ specific to errors? , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[5]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting in adolescents: analysis of performance, response times and heart rate. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[6]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[7]  S. Lea.  Elements of a two-process theory of learning, J.A. Gray. Academic Press, London and New York (1975), x, + 423. Price £6·60/$16.50 , 1976 .

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[9]  D. Fowles.  Psychophysiology and psychopathology: a motivational approach. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Beatrice C. Lacey,et al.  Studies of heart rate and other bodily processes in sensorimotor behavior. , 1974 .

[11]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Tucker,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex in Action Monitoring , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  F. Iaboni,et al.  Psychophysiological response of ADHD children to reward and extinction. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[14]  D. Tucker,et al.  Electrophysiological Responses to Errors and Feedback in the Process of Action Regulation , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[16]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  C. Brunia,et al.  Changes in heart rate and slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[18]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[19]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[20]  R. Simons,et al.  To err is autonomic: error-related brain potentials, ANS activity, and post-error compensatory behavior. , 2003, Psychophysiology.