The Nordic Housing Enabler: Inter-rater reliability in cross-Nordic occupational therapy practice

Abstract This study addresses development of a content-valid cross-Nordic version of the Housing Enabler and investigation of its inter-rater reliability when used in occupational therapy rating situations, involving occupational therapists, clients, and their home environments. The instrument was translated from the original Swedish version of the Housing Enabler, and adapted according to accessibility norms and guidelines for housing design in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland. This iterative process involved occupational therapists, architects, building engineers, and professional translators, resulting in the Nordic Housing Enabler. For reliability testing, the sampling strategy and data collection procedures used were the same in all countries. Twenty voluntary occupational therapists, pair-wise but independently of each other, collected data from 106 cases by means of the Nordic Housing Enabler. Inter-rater reliability was calculated by means of percentage agreement and kappa statistics. Overall good percentage agreement for the personal and environmental components of the instrument was shown, indicating that the instrument was sufficiently reliable for application in practice and research in the Nordic context. The varying kappa results highlight the need for further study in order to understand the influence of prevalence more profoundly, which should be kept in mind when interpreting the results.

[1]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  M P Lawton,et al.  The ecology of social relationships in housing for the elderly. , 1968, The Gerontologist.

[3]  M. Powell Lawton,et al.  Ecology and the aging process. , 1973 .

[4]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[5]  J. Carlin,et al.  Bias, prevalence and kappa. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Development of a Novel Instrument for Occupational Therapy of Assessment of the Physical Environment in the Home—A Methodologic Study on “The Enabler” , 1996 .

[7]  T. Sumsion Book Review: Enabling Occupation: An Occupational Therapy Perspective , 1997 .

[8]  Elizabeth DePoy,et al.  Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies , 1998 .

[9]  J. Etter,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of a psychometric instrument: two methods compared. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2000 .

[11]  F. Hoehler Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Housing Enabler 1.0: A Tool for Housing Accessibility Analysis. Software for PC. , 2001 .

[13]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  International development of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). , 2001, Journal of affective disorders.

[14]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  The Housing Enabler. An Instrument for Assessing and Analysing Accessibility Problems in Housing. , 2001 .

[15]  Gunilla Carlsson Catching the Bus in Old Age - Methodological Aspects of Accessibility Assessments in Public Transport , 2002 .

[16]  Silke Schmidt,et al.  Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Peter Hagell,et al.  International use of health status questionnaires in Parkinson's disease: translation is not enough. , 2003, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[18]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Conducting research on home environments: lessons learned and new directions. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[20]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Accessibility and usability in housing: construct validity and implications for research and practice , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  Hanne Thorsen,et al.  Adapting quality of life instruments. , 2004, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[22]  M. Niero,et al.  A new instrument for assessing quality of life in atopic dermatitis: international development of the Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[23]  H. S. Andersen Housing and housing policy in the Nordic countries , 2004 .

[24]  S M Hunt,et al.  International development of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (Qlds). , 2004, Journal of affective disorders.

[25]  Werner Vach,et al.  The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Cross-national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the Housing Enabler , 2005, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[27]  P. Hagell Feasibility and linguistic validity of the Swedish version of the PDQ-39 , 2005, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[28]  G. Fisher Occupational therapy intervention process model : a model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions , 2009 .