Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Optimization – From Physics-Based Computer Simulations to High-Fidelity Head Phantom Fabrication and Measurements

Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates neural networks. Computer simulations, while used to identify how currents behave within tissues of different conductivity properties, still need to be complemented by physical models. Objective/Hypothesis To better understand tDCS effects on biology-mimicking tissues by developing and testing the feasibility of a high-fidelity 3D head phantom model that has sensing capabilities at different compartmental levels. Methods Models obtained from MRI images generated 3D printed molds. Agar phantoms were fabricated, and 18 monitoring electrodes were placed on specific phantom brain areas. Results When using rectangular electrodes, the measured and simulated voltages at the monitoring electrodes agreed reasonably well, except at excitation locations. The electric field distribution in different phantom layers appeared better confined with circular electrodes compared to rectangular electrodes. Conclusion The high-fidelity 3D head model was found to be feasible and comparable with computer-based electrical simulations, with high correlation between simulated and measured brain voltages. This feasibility study supports testing to further assess the reliability of this model.

[1]  D. Bennett NaCl doping and the conductivity of agar phantoms , 2011 .

[2]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[3]  J J Riera,et al.  Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016 , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[6]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.

[7]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  An image-guided transcranial direct current stimulation system: a pilot phantom study , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Deniz Erdogmus,et al.  Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  R. Bakay,et al.  Postmortem study of deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus: case report. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[12]  A. Lozano,et al.  Postmortem studies of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of the literature , 2017, Cell and Tissue Research.

[13]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans , 2018, Nature Communications.

[14]  Roberto Guerrieri,et al.  A Four-Shell Diffusion Phantom of the Head for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  Validation of Computational Studies for Electrical Brain Stimulation With Phantom Head Experiments , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  A new improved version of the realistic digital brain phantom , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[18]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool , 2008, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[19]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[20]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[21]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS , 2015, NeuroImage.

[22]  R Andy McKinley,et al.  Acceleration of image analyst training with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2013, Behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Head phantoms for electroencephalography and transcranial electric stimulation: a skull material study , 2018, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[24]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  G. J. Shaw,et al.  Comparison of electrical conductivities of various brain phantom gels: Developing a 'Brain Gel Model' , 2012, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.