Testing the Mechanisms Underlying Improved Distance Judgments in Virtual Environments

Virtual environments (VEs) presented via head-mounted displays are typically perceived as smaller in scale than intended. Visual–motor experience in VEs can reduce this underestimation of distance, though the mechanisms underlying this improved accuracy of distance estimates are unknown. To address this question, we created a mismatch between biomechanical and visual indicators of self-movement within the VE, and assessed the effect on distance and size judgments. Our results suggest that visual–motor feedback influences subsequent distance judgments by recalibrating perceptual–motor relationships, but we found no evidence that perceived size, which was substantially underestimated, changed as a function of this feedback. In contrast to recent studies that suggest that feedback in VEs causes a broad rescaling of virtual space, our results are consistent with a visual–motor recalibration account for much of the improvement in distance judgments following VE experience.

[1]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  More than just perception–action recalibration: Walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[2]  A. S. Gilinsky.  Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[3]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Evidence for motor simulation in imagined locomotion. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Benjamin J Chihak,et al.  Manipulating perception versus action in recalibration tasks , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[6]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Recalibration of Perceived Distance in Virtual Environments Occurs Rapidly and Transfers Asymmetrically Across Scale , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  W C Gogel,et al.  The sensing of retinal size. , 1969, Vision research.

[8]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[9]  J M Loomis,et al.  Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  M. Wraga,et al.  The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and object dimensions , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  David Waller,et al.  Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment , 2007, TAP.

[15]  V. R. Carlson.  Underestimation in Size-Constancy Judgments , 1960 .

[16]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Size-distance paradox with accommodative micropsia , 1974 .

[17]  Thomas Banton,et al.  The Perception of Walking Speed in a Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[19]  R N Haber,et al.  The independence of size perception and distance perception , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  David Waller,et al.  Interaction With an Immersive Virtual Environment Corrects Users' Distance Estimates , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments , 2006, APGV '06.

[22]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Does Energy Expenditure Affect the Perception of Egocentric Distance? A Failure to Replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) , 2006, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[23]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Does Perceptual-Motor Calibration Generalize across Two Different Forms of Locomotion? Investigations of Walking and Wheelchairs , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  J. Loomis,et al.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  O. Sabouraud.  [Space perception]. , 1978, Revue d'oto-neuro-ophtalmologie.

[26]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  Size-Constancy in the CAVE , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[27]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  The Effects of Scene Complexity, Stereovision, and Motion Parallax on Size Constancy in a Virtual Environment , 2007, 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[29]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[30]  Adam R. Richardson,et al.  The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments , 2005 .