Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks

Animals that travel together in groups display a variety of fascinating motion patterns thought to be the result of delicate local interactions among group members. Although the most informative way of investigating and interpreting collective movement phenomena would be afforded by the collection of high-resolution spatiotemporal data from moving individuals, such data are scarce and are virtually non-existent for long-distance group motion within a natural setting because of the associated technological difficulties. Here we present results of experiments in which track logs of homing pigeons flying in flocks of up to 10 individuals have been obtained by high-resolution lightweight GPS devices and analysed using a variety of correlation functions inspired by approaches common in statistical physics. We find a well-defined hierarchy among flock members from data concerning leading roles in pairwise interactions, defined on the basis of characteristic delay times between birds’ directional choices. The average spatial position of a pigeon within the flock strongly correlates with its place in the hierarchy, and birds respond more quickly to conspecifics perceived primarily through the left eye—both results revealing differential roles for birds that assume different positions with respect to flock-mates. From an evolutionary perspective, our results suggest that hierarchical organization of group flight may be more efficient than an egalitarian one, at least for those flock sizes that permit regular pairwise interactions among group members, during which leader–follower relationships are consistently manifested.

[1]  F. Heppner,et al.  Laboratory determination of startle reaction time of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[4]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[5]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[6]  The social transmission of spatial information in homing pigeons , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  J. Hutchinson Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[8]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Leadership in fish shoals , 2000 .

[9]  Taku Komura,et al.  Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Self‐Organization in Biological Systems.Princeton Studies in Complexity. ByScott Camazine,, Jean‐Louis Deneubourg,, Nigel R Franks,, James Sneyd,, Guy Theraulaz, and, Eric Bonabeau; original line drawings by, William Ristineand, Mary Ellen Didion; StarLogo programming by, William Thies. Princeton (N , 2002 .

[11]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[12]  Y. Tu,et al.  Moving and staying together without a leader , 2003, cond-mat/0401257.

[13]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs , 2003, Nature.

[14]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[15]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Visual lateralization and homing in pigeons , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of fish schools , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Dora Biro,et al.  Familiar route loyalty implies visual pilotage in the homing pigeon. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Levin,et al.  Dynamics of fish shoals: identifying key decision rules , 2004 .

[19]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Pigeon Homing along Highways and Exits , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[21]  Christophe Becco,et al.  Experimental evidences of a structural and dynamical transition in fish school , 2006 .

[22]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[23]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[24]  Ilya R. Fischhoff,et al.  Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  M. Walker,et al.  Evidence that pigeons orient to geomagnetic intensity during homing , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[27]  G. Dell’Omo,et al.  Flock flying improves pigeons' homing: GPS track analysis of individual flyers versus small groups , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Comparing bird and human soaring strategies , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  C. Sueur,et al.  Organization of Group Members at Departure Is Driven by Social Structure in Macaca , 2008, International Journal of Primatology.

[30]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Dora Biro,et al.  Modelling Group Navigation: Dominance and Democracy in Homing Pigeons , 2009 .

[32]  Language Lateralization and Psychosis: Cerebral lateralization in animal species , 2009 .

[33]  Iztok Lebar Bajec,et al.  Organized flight in birds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  I. Couzin,et al.  “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[35]  R. Kahn,et al.  Language lateralization and psychosis , 2009 .