MUTUAL SPECIALISATION, SEAPORTS AND THE GEOGRAPHY OF AUTOMOBILE IMPORTS

This paper argues for a more actor-centred approach in freight transportation studies, one that includes freight shippers and public authorities, as well as carriers, and that pays close attention to the relationships between these actors. One advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the conditions under which global logistics flows may become relatively fixed in particular localities. The perspective is illustrated through a discussion of the geography of port usage by importers of automobiles to the US since 1980. The need to secure space at or near marine terminals for vehicle processing activities is a driving factor in port selection. While the overall trade in automobiles has not become concentrated in fewer ports over the last 20 years, individual firms are concentrating the bulk of their import operations in fewer ports. This "mutual specialisation" involves a process of interpenetration between actors that is only visible in a disaggregated analysis. Copyright (c) 2004 by the Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG.

[1]  K. Cox.  Spaces of globalization : reasserting the power of the local , 1997 .

[2]  P. Dicken.  Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[3]  A. Lipietz.  The Local and the Global: Regional Individuality or Interregionalism? , 1993 .

[4]  Jacques Charlier.  Structural change in the Belgian port system, 1980–1986 , 1988 .

[5]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Limits to Capital , 1983 .

[6]  G Murphy,et al.  Structural Change , 2004 .

[7]  A E Pisarski,et al.  NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS , 2000 .

[8]  Trevor D. Heaver,et al.  The implications of increased competition among ports for port policy and management , 1995 .

[9]  Peter Hall,et al.  The Institution of Infrastructure and the Development of Port-Regions , 2002 .

[10]  Brian Slack,et al.  The challenge of peripheral ports: an Asian perspective , 2002 .

[11]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports , 2005 .

[12]  Robert J. McCalla,et al.  From St. John's to Miami: Containerisation at Eastern Seaboard Ports , 1999 .

[13]  R Vickerman.  THE TRANSPORT SECTOR, NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN PERIPHERAL REGIONS. IN: NEW CONTRIBUTIONS TO TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS IN EUROPE , 1999 .

[14]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry , 2002 .

[15]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[16]  Peter Hall,et al.  Persistent Variation: Flexibility, Organization, and Strategy in the Logistics of Importing Automobiles to the United States, 1980–99 , 2004 .

[17]  Brian Slack,et al.  Pawns in the Game: Ports in a Global Transportation System , 1993 .

[18]  A. Hayford.  The Limits to Capital , 1984 .

[19]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  The information age: Economy, society and culture. , 1998 .

[20]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[21]  A. Wood.  THE CAPITALIST IMPERATIVE: TERRITORY, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH , 1993 .

[22]  Yehuda Hayut.  Containerization and the Load Center Concept , 1981 .

[23]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[24]  Claude Comtois,et al.  Shipping lines as agents of change in the port industry , 1996 .

[25]  Emmanuel Guy,et al.  Shipping line networks and the integration of South America trades , 2003 .

[26]  Kevin R. Cox,et al.  Globalisation, Competition and the Politics of Local Economic Development , 1995 .

[27]  N. Brenner.  Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union , 1999 .

[28]  James Bird,et al.  Seaports and seaport terminals , 1971 .