The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score: normal values, influence factors and proposed cut-off values.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Progressive fibrosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in chronic liver disease. To replace liver biopsy for disease staging, multiple serum markers are under evaluation with multiparametric panels yielding the most promising results. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score is an ECM marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease. METHODS The ELF score was measured in 400 healthy controls and 79 chronic hepatitis C patients using an ADVIA Centaur automated system. The ELF score was calculated using the published algorithm combining TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA values. Patients' fibrosis stage was defined histologically. ROC analyses were performed to study marker validity. Reference values and influence factors for the ELF score were validated. RESULTS ELF score reference values ranged from 6.7 to 9.8 and were significantly higher for men vs. women (7.0-9.9 vs. 6.6-9.3, respectively). Afternoon values were slightly higher than morning values (6.7-9.9 vs. 6.6-9.5, respectively). Age was a notable influence factor. We identified three cut-off values: 7.7 for a high sensitivity exclusion of fibrosis, 9.8 for a high specificity identification of fibrosis (sensitivity 69%, specificity 98% for moderate fibrosis), and 11.3 to discriminate cirrhosis (sensitivity 83%, specificity 97%). ELF score validity was superior to the results of the single tests. CONCLUSIONS The ELF score can predict moderate fibrosis and cirrhosis. However, influence factors such as gender and age need to be taken into account.

[1]  Llorenç Quintó,et al.  Identification of chronic hepatitis C patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model , 2002, Hepatology.

[2]  R. Testa,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of fibrosis: The truth is rarely pure and never simple , 2003, Hepatology.

[3]  S. Friedman,et al.  Pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. , 2011, Annual review of pathology.

[4]  W. Rosenberg,et al.  Performance of ELF serum markers in predicting fibrosis stage in pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. , 2009, Gastroenterology.

[5]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C , 2003, Hepatology.

[6]  J. Talwalkar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis , 2011, Hepatology.

[7]  Rosa Gilabert,et al.  ARFI, FibroScan, ELF, and their combinations in the assessment of liver fibrosis: a prospective study. , 2012, Journal of hepatology.

[8]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Variations in Liver Biopsy Interpretation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C , 1994 .

[9]  P. Bedossa,et al.  Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: Detection and Significance , 2000, Seminars in liver disease.

[10]  Neil Kaplowitz,et al.  Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis , 1981, Hepatology.

[11]  G. Ramadori,et al.  Mesenchymal cells in the liver--one cell type or two? , 2002, Liver.

[12]  Heather Fry,et al.  A user’s guide , 2003 .

[13]  K. Ishak,et al.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. , 1995 .

[14]  M. Manns,et al.  Biopsy-Controlled Liver Fibrosis Staging Using the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score Compared to Transient Elastography , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  A. West,et al.  Prediction of clinical outcomes in primary biliary cirrhosis by serum enhanced liver fibrosis assay , 2008, Hepatology.

[16]  T. Poynard,et al.  Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study , 2001, The Lancet.

[17]  G. Alexander,et al.  Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease , 2010, Gut.

[18]  Samer S El-Kamary,et al.  Role of liver biopsy in management of chronic hepatitis C: A systematic review , 2002, Hepatology.

[19]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Role of a cirrhosis risk score for the early prediction of fibrosis progression in hepatitis C patients with minimal liver disease. , 2009, Journal of hepatology.

[20]  R. Lichtinghagen,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of fibrosis in chronic liver disease , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[21]  I. Guha,et al.  Noninvasive markers of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Validating the European Liver Fibrosis Panel and exploring simple markers , 2007, Hepatology.

[22]  J C Boyd,et al.  On dividing reference data into subgroups to produce separate reference ranges. , 1990, Clinical chemistry.

[23]  A. Baranova,et al.  Non-Invasive markers for hepatic fibrosis , 2011, BMC gastroenterology.

[24]  Herrine,et al.  Schiff's diseases of the liver , 1999, Gastroenterology.

[25]  P. Scheuer,et al.  Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment. , 1991, Journal of hepatology.

[26]  X. Forns,et al.  Assessment of liver fibrosis before and after antiviral therapy by different serum marker panels in patients with chronic hepatitis C , 2011, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[27]  Laurent Castera,et al.  Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[28]  D. Schuppan,et al.  Serum markers detect the presence of liver fibrosis: a cohort study. , 2004, Gastroenterology.