The orbit deployment strategy of OOS system for refueling near-earth orbit satellites

Abstract Extend lifetime of near-earth orbit satellites by on-orbit refueling has significant economic benefits, while the orbit deployment strategy of the on-orbit servicing (OOS) system which implements the refueling task directly affects the efficiency of on-orbit refueling mission. Three orbit deployment modes were proposed, including ground deployment, low earth orbit (LEO) deployment and the same orbit deployment. For the client satellites to be refueled on near-earth orbit including LEO, medium earth orbit (MEO) and geosynchronous orbit (GEO), the three deployment modes were compared quantitatively based on two evaluation indicators: the refueling response time and the economic benefits. The comparing results showed that for MEO and GEO client satellites, it is appropriate to adopt the same orbit deployment mode, while for LEO client satellites, ground deployment mode is more suitable. As the maximum economic benefits can be earned to refuel GEO client satellites, the orbit deployment scheme of OOS system for refueling GEO client satellites was further studied. A new architecture of OOS system called “1+N” consist of 1 fuel storage station and N refueling vehicles was proposed. The fuel storage station carries a great deal of fuel, running on orbit steadily. The refueling vehicles maneuver on GEO and implement the refueling operations for GEO client satellites. If the vehicles run out of fuel, they arrive at the station to be refueled. The weight and orbital altitude of fuel storage station, the number, weight, orbital altitude and orbital phase of refueling vehicles are the key parameters of the orbit deployment scheme. The mathematical model for optimizing the scheme was constructed, which takes shorten the refueling response time and lower the cost of OOS system as multi-objective. The calculation process of the optimization was explained. By analyzing the optimization results, the optimal orbit deployment scheme of OOS system containing 1 fuel storage station and 4 to 6 refueling vehicles was proposed.

[1]  Matthew G. Richards,et al.  Assessing the challenges to a geosynchronous space tug system , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Erin Eichenberg-Bicknell,et al.  Using a Value-centric Tool Framework to Optimize Lifecycle Cost, Value, and Risk of Spacecraft Architectures , 2009 .

[3]  Ye Yan,et al.  Optimal scheduling of multiple geosynchronous satellites refueling based on a hybrid particle swarm optimizer , 2015 .

[4]  U. Walter,et al.  Trajectory planning of free-floating space robot using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) , 2015 .

[5]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[6]  Bing Li,et al.  A universal on-orbit servicing system used in the geostationary orbit , 2011 .

[7]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Economic case for the retirement of geosynchronous communication satellites via space tugs , 2006 .

[8]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  When will on-orbit servicing be part of the space enterprise? , 2016 .

[9]  Jing Yu,et al.  Optimal mission planning of GEO on-orbit refueling in mixed strategy , 2017 .

[10]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Comparison Between Peer-to-Peer and Single-Spacecraft Refueling Strategies for Spacecraft in Circular Orbits , 2005 .

[11]  Jing Yu,et al.  Optimal scheduling of multispacecraft refueling based on cooperative maneuver , 2015 .

[12]  K. Alfriend,et al.  Optimal Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites , 2002 .

[13]  Michel van Tooren,et al.  On-orbit servicing system assessment and optimization methods based on lifecycle simulation under mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainties , 2013 .

[14]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  On-Orbit Servicing: A New Value Proposition for Satellite Design and Operation , 2007 .

[15]  David L. Akin,et al.  A SURVEY OF SERVICEABLE SPACECRAFT FAILURES , 2001 .

[16]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[17]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[18]  Jennifer Kingston,et al.  Assessment of the commercial viability of selected options for on-orbit servicing (OOS) , 2015 .

[19]  Kamran Daneshjou,et al.  Mission planning for on-orbit servicing through multiple servicing satellites: A new approach , 2017 .

[20]  Zahra Mohaghegh,et al.  Incorporating organizational factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of complex socio-technical systems: A hybrid technique formalization , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Deployment strategies of on-orbit service vehicles for multi-objective group and multiple spacecraft , 2017 .

[22]  Jin Zhang,et al.  LEO cooperative multi-spacecraft refueling mission optimization considering J2 perturbation and target’s surplus propellant constraint , 2017 .

[23]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Egalitarian Peer-to-Peer Satellite Refueling Strategy , 2008 .

[24]  Ye Yan,et al.  Mission planning optimization for multiple geosynchronous satellites refueling , 2015 .

[25]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Application of the MOAA to Satellite Constellation Refueling Optimization , 2013, EMO.

[26]  David L. Akin,et al.  A Parametric Investigation of Satellite Servicing Requirements, Revenues and Options in Geostationary Orbit , 2015 .

[27]  Atri Dutta,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Refueling Strategy Using Low-Thrust Propulsion , 2010 .

[28]  Guillermo Ortega,et al.  Ground guided CX-OLEV rendez-vous with uncooperative geostationary satellite , 2006 .

[29]  David L. Akin,et al.  Satellite Servicing Opportunities In Geosynchronous Orbit , 2012 .

[30]  Panagiotis Tsiotras,et al.  Asynchronous optimal mixed P2P satellite refueling strategies , 2006 .