Symmetry and linearity of trunk function in subjects with non-specific low back pain.

Objective. To investigate the effect of a standard rehabilitation program on the symmetry of trunk kinematics in subjects with non-specific low back pain.Design. Assessing lumbar spine kinematics in the cardinal planes using dynamometry.Background. Previous evaluations of trunk symmetry focussed more on anatomical rather than functional symmetry. Correlation of functional symmetry with low back pain was occasionally performed, but only for base line evaluations. To the best of the author's knowledge, there is no study examining the effect of exercise on the functional symmetry of the trunk, especially in non-specific low back pain subjects.Methods. Two groups of young male subjects whose working conditions incurred long daily hours of sitting and standing participated in the study. Muscles of the lumbar spine were initially evaluated in the cardinal planes using dynamometry. The same parameters (maximum isometric torque, dynamic torque, angular velocity and range of motion) were then repeatedly measured throughout a standardized strength protocol lasting for 12 sessions over a four-week period.Results. As pain gradually disappeared over a one-month period of rehabilitation, certain factors of the trunk kinematics exhibited convergence towards perfect symmetry while others showed oscillations. Moreover, global right-left data for certain trunk kinematics exhibited near-perfect linear relationship.Conclusion. Functional symmetry of the trunk in the coronal and transverse planes can be used to assess the progress of rehabilitation programs of non-specific low back pain subjects. RelevanceRehabilitation programs focus on the progress of directly measured trunk kinematics, which do not always exhibit monotonic behavior. This paper alludes to the importance of tracking symmetry of trunk kinematics as it may help clinicians modify the strengthening protocols in order to achieve more rapid relief from back pain.

[1]  R. Deyo,et al.  Descriptive Epidemiology of Low‐back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United States , 1987, Spine.

[2]  T. Gómez,et al.  Symmetry of lumbar rotation and lateral flexion range of motion and isometric strength in subjects with and without low back pain. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[3]  W S Marras,et al.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Trunk Response to Asymmetric Trunk Motion , 1992, Spine.

[4]  M Szpalski,et al.  Classification of Low Back Pain From Dynamic Motion Characteristics Using an Artificial Neural Network , 1997, Spine.

[5]  Robert J. Gregor,et al.  Kinesiology and applied anatomy , 1989 .

[6]  G. Jull,et al.  Lumbar spine kinesthesia in patients with low back pain. , 1999, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[7]  P. Esselman,et al.  Torque development in isokinetic training. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Zeevi Dvir,et al.  Isokinetics : muscle testing, interpretation, and clinical applications , 1995 .

[9]  J. Malchaire,et al.  Relation Between Functional Characteristics of the Trunk and the Occurrence of Low Back Pain: Associated Risk Factors , 1998, Spine.

[10]  J. Brox,et al.  Predictors of isokinetic back muscle strength in patients with low back pain. , 1999, Spine.

[11]  Elsayed Abdel-Moty,et al.  Ergonomics in Back Pain: A Guide to Prevention and Rehabilitation , 1993 .

[12]  M. Pope,et al.  Range of Motion and Motion Patterns in Patients With Low Back Pain Before and After Rehabilitation , 1998, Spine.

[13]  Hiroshi Yamamoto,et al.  Trunk Muscle Strength in and Effect of Trunk Muscle Exercises for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: The Differences in Patients with and Without Organic Lumbar Lesions , 1995, Spine.

[14]  J. Malchaire,et al.  Isometric and Dynamic Performances of the Trunk and Associated Factors , 1995, Spine.

[15]  H. Hermens,et al.  Relationships between isoinertial lumbar dynamometry parameters and demographic parameters in chronic low back pain patients , 1998, European Spine Journal.