Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development

This paper addresses the understudied issue of how individually held expertise in information systems development (ISD) teams results in creativity at the team level during the development process. We develop the idea that team creativity results primarily from integration of individually held expertise of team members at the team level. We further propose the quality of intrateam relationships and knowledge complementarities that align the work of individual team members at the project level influence creativity primarily through the process of expertise integration. We use data from a field study of 142 participants in 42 ISD projects to test the proposed model. The paper makes three new contributions to the IS literature. Its key contribution lies in developing an expertise integration view of team creativity. We demonstrate the centrality of integrating individually held tacit and explicit knowledge about the problem domain and the technology at the team level in achieving team creativity. The use of a process-focused conceptualization of team creativity is especially noteworthy here. The second contribution of the paper lies in conceptually developing and operationalizing the concept of expertise integration, a mechanism by which individually held knowledge is integratively applied at the project level. Although the importance of knowledge in the ISD process is widely recognized in prior research, this is the first study to develop the concept in a operationally meaningful way. The third key contribution lies in showing that the compositional and relational attributes of ISD project teams--diverse specialized knowledge in a team, the quality of intrateam working relationships, and members' cross-domain absorptive capacity--do not engender creativity by themselves; they do so primarily because they enhance integration of individual knowledge at the project level. We offer empirical evidence for such full mediation. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications, which are discussed in the paper.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Brenda Massetti,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation , 1996, MIS Q..

[3]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[5]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[6]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[7]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[8]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[9]  Michel Benaroch,et al.  Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Options Perspective , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: An International Perspective , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[13]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Learning to Specify Information Requirements: The Relationship between Application and Methodology , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[15]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[16]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[17]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, Barriers, and New Developments , 1999 .

[18]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Stimulating ideas through creativity software , 1994 .

[19]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration , 1993, CACM.

[20]  F NunamakerJay,et al.  Systems development in information systems research , 1990 .

[21]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[22]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[23]  Glenn J. Browne,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of User Requirements Elicitation: Comparing the Effectiveness of Prompting Techniques , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[25]  Ben Shneiderman.  Creativity support tools: a tutorial overview , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[26]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[27]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Can Software Influence Creativity? , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[29]  Pierre N. Robillard,et al.  The role of knowledge in software development , 1999, CACM.

[30]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Organizational Learning during Advanced System Development: Opportunities and Obstacles , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[32]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  The Dependent Variable in Research Into the Effects of Creativity Support Systems: Quality and Quantity of Ideas , 1998, MIS Q..

[33]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[34]  Larry L. Constantine,et al.  Orchestrating project organization and management , 1993, CACM.

[35]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[36]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  A Unified Model of Requirements Elicitation , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Tarek K. Abdel-Hamid,et al.  A study of staff turnover, acquisition, and assimilation and their impact on software development cost and schedule , 1989 .

[39]  Brad Tuttle,et al.  A Study of Staff Turnover, Acquisition, and Assimilation and Their Impact on Software Development Cost and Schedule , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Creative Process: The Effects of Group Memory on Individual Idea Generation , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  Information Technology Development Creativity: A Case Study of Attempted Radical Change , 2000, MIS Q..

[42]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Creativity enhancement in problem solving: through software or process? , 1997 .

[44]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[45]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[46]  B. Adelson,et al.  The Role of Domain Expenence in Software Design , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[47]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[48]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[49]  Amrit Tiwana.  Knowledge Integration in Virtual Teams: The Potential Role of Knowledge Management Systems , 2006 .

[50]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Enabling the Effective Involvement of Multiple Users: Methods and Tools for Collaborative Software Engineering , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[52]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[54]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[55]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  The Matrix of Control: Combining Process and Structure Approaches to Managing Software Development , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .

[58]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  J. T. M. van Der Zee,et al.  Alignment Is Not Enough: Integrating Business and Information Technology Management with the Balanced Business Scorecard , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  M. Lindvall,et al.  Knowledge management in software engineering , 2002, IEEE Software.

[62]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[63]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Power in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[64]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[65]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[66]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[67]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[68]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications , 1975 .

[69]  Girish H. Subramanian,et al.  An Examination of Some Software Development Effort and Productivity Determinants in ICASE Tool Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[70]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[71]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[72]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[73]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[74]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[75]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[76]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment From Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams , 1999 .

[77]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Coordination of Information Systems Plans with Business Plans , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..