Provident decision making by considering dynamic and fuzzy environment for FMS evaluation

When evaluating complexity, cost and risk increase, it is difficult to make a proper decision. In such situations it is necessary to develop a model which simulates a decision maker's mind and consider both a dynamic and a fuzzy environment. In this study future oriented indices are presented which enable us to consider the effect of future changes in the index value during the decision making process. These future oriented indices are named provident indices. Also in this study to effectively integrate these multiple criteria into the decision making process, based on the analysis of the decision situation in such assessments, a suitable concept is selected. This method is based on the preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) which brings together flexibility and simplicity for the user and is therefore chosen for the enhancement towards the evaluation of fuzzy data on preferences, scores and weights. The model developed to investigate these impacts cannot perfectly reproduce all the events of the real system, but it can consider a fair number of elements of variability, which should be identified and analysed by considering present conditions and prediction about criteria values in future periods. Such a model may provide solutions with a high degree of robustness and reliability, comparable with those obtained by direct experimentation, but with a low computational cost. The uniqueness of this paper lies in two important areas: first, the incorporation of variability fuzzy and provident measures in the performance of alternatives into the decision making process; and second, is in the application of fuzzy PROMETHEE that provides the decision maker with effective alternative choices by identifying significant differences among alternatives and appropriate choices through considered future periods, and presents graphic aids for better interpretation of results. A comprehensive numerical example of a flexible manufacturing system (FMS) is provided to illustrate the results of the analysis. In a real-world manufacturing environment, the dynamics of an FMS and its stochastic characteristics require a specific approach for evaluation. This paper specifically focuses on FMSs due to the complexities involved in their proper evaluation that include factors such as high operational and managerial expertise in system implementation phases, high costs and risks. Due to these, evaluation, justification, and implementation of an FMS have been areas of major concern and importance for practitioners and researchers. In this case, various strategic, economic and operational criteria that envelop quantitative, qualitative, tangible, and intangible factors are considered.

[1]  G. Azzone,et al.  Measuring manufacturing competence : a fuzzy approach , 1996 .

[2]  S. M. Shafer,et al.  Efficiency measurement of alternative machine component grouping solutions via data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[3]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A nonparametric stochastic procedure for FMS evaluation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTIVARIATE METHODS AS DECISION MAKING MODELS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF OPERATOR ALLOCATION BY COMPUTER SIMULATION IN CMS , 2009 .

[5]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  A decision support system for selection and justification of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1997 .

[6]  Z. Irani,et al.  Quantification of flexibility in advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy concept , 2004 .

[7]  John R. Canada,et al.  Past and Present Methods of Manufacturing Investment Evaluation: A Review of the Empirical and Theoretical Literature , 1992 .

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[9]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[10]  Mario T. Tabucanon,et al.  A multiple-criteria approach to machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems , 1994 .

[11]  M. Amparo Vila,et al.  A fuzziness measure for fuzzy numbers: Applications , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[12]  E. Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments , 2001 .

[13]  Ramesh Jain,et al.  DECISION MAKING IN THE PRESENCE OF FUZZY VARIABLES , 1976 .

[14]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas , 1993 .

[15]  Laurence Tianruo Yang,et al.  Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1999 .

[16]  Andrea Rangone,et al.  A reference framework for the application of MADM fuzzy techniques to selecting AMTS , 1998 .

[17]  Ram Rachamadugu,et al.  A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1997 .

[18]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach , 2005 .

[19]  E. Ertugrul Karsak A TWO-PHASE ROBOT SELECTION PROCEDURE , 1998 .

[20]  M. H. Small,et al.  Economic and strategic justification of AMT inferences from industrial practices , 1997 .

[21]  E. Tolga,et al.  Justification of manufacturing technologies using fuzzy benefit/cost ratio analysis , 2000 .

[22]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[23]  Massimo Gastaldi,et al.  Dynamic analysis of the performance of a flexible manufacturing system: a real case application , 1996 .

[24]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection , 1993 .

[25]  L. Zadeh Probability measures of Fuzzy events , 1968 .

[26]  Shan-Huo Chen Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set , 1985 .

[27]  Annie Laforet,et al.  METHODES MULTICRITERES ELECTRE. DESCRIPTION, CONSEILS PRATIQUES ET CAS D'APPLICATION A LA GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTALE , 1996 .

[28]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  T. Stewart A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[30]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[31]  G. Bortolan,et al.  A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets , 1985 .

[32]  Massimo Gastaldi,et al.  Performance analysis of a flexible manufacturing system: A statistical approach , 1998 .

[33]  B. Roy,et al.  L'aide multicritère à la décision , 1989 .

[34]  Jutta Geldermann,et al.  Development of a multiple criteria based decision support system for environmental assessment of recycling measures in the iron and steel making industry , 1998 .