Fast visuomotor processing made faster by sound

Reaction time to a visual event can be dramatically reduced if the visual stimulus is accompanied by a startling sound. The mechanism may involve a motor programme being stored and triggered early by the sound. However, in a choice reaction task the required response is not known in advance, and so cannot be stored. In this case startling sound does not usually speed up the reaction and may even be detrimental to performance. Here we show that the reaction time of a special type of visually evoked movement can be substantially reduced by startling sound, even though the movement requires choice. The task involved stepping onto an illuminated target that sometimes moved mid‐step left or right, requiring a foot trajectory adjustment. These adjustments occur at much shorter latency than conventional visuomotor reaction tasks and are thought to involve subcortical brain areas. The presence of the sound, which carried no information, shortened the already fast mean response time of 134 ms by ∼20 ms. We attribute this to auditory–visual interaction since sound alone had no effect. Although we observed startle responses, the quickening effect was not contingent upon their presence. Given minimum motor and sensory conduction time, we estimate that the loud sound reduced the central visuomotor processing time by at least 30%.

[1]  S. Hackley,et al.  Accessory Stimulus Effects on Response Selection: Does Arousal Speed Decision Making? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J C Rothwell,et al.  New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  P. Thompson,et al.  The hyperekplexias and their relationship to the normal startle reflex. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Mark H. Clark,et al.  Intermodal effects in choice reaction time , 1969 .

[5]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Startle response is dishabituated during a reaction time task , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Prepared Movements Are Elicited Early by Startle , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  T. Sinkjær,et al.  Evidence for a supraspinal contribution to the human quadriceps long-latency stretch reflex , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The startle reflex, voluntary movement, and the reticulospinal tract. , 2006, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  B. Day,et al.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  M. Giard,et al.  Auditory-Visual Integration during Multimodal Object Recognition in Humans: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Hackley,et al.  Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task , 1998, Nature.

[17]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  B. Day,et al.  Rapid visuo-motor processes drive the leg regardless of balance constraints , 2005, Current Biology.

[20]  V Weerdesteyn,et al.  Gait adjustments in response to an obstacle are faster than voluntary reactions. , 2004, Human movement science.

[21]  Paul W. Frankland,et al.  The acoustic startle reflex: neurons and connections , 1995, Brain Research Reviews.

[22]  J. Movshon,et al.  The Timing of Response Onset and Offset in Macaque Visual Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Passingham,et al.  Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  D. Pélisson,et al.  Direct evidence for the contribution of the superior colliculus in the control of visually guided reaching movements in the cat , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  P. Brown,et al.  Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  T. Stanford,et al.  Evaluating the Operations Underlying Multisensory Integration in the Cat Superior Colliculus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  The Relationship between Reaction Time and Intensity in Discrete Auditory Tasks , 1979, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[30]  Sidney S. Simon,et al.  Merging of the Senses , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[31]  Liang Li,et al.  Tactile, acoustic and vestibular systems sum to elicit the startle reflex , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  J. Duysens,et al.  Modulation of the startle response during human gait. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  M T Wallace,et al.  Cross-modal synthesis in the midbrain depends on input from cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.