Effects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: a comparison between subscription-based and full Open Access models

This study analyses the performance of journals and publications based on their type of archiving policies. The main objective is the assessment of the feasibility of the journal typologies with a special emphasis on the comparison of both the subscription-based and the Open Access models. The analysis is backed by the combination of data contained in four of the main bibliographic databases to offer comprehensive, new and updated data on OA (Sherpa-RoMEO, DOAJ, Web of Science and Scopus). A total of 18.3 million articles and reviews were analysed between 2005 and 2015. In the comparison of Web of Science and Scopus, we found that the proportion of OA publications is 5% inferior in WoS. The growth of the total number of documents published in Gold OA journals is noteworthy in the period analysed. However, the study of the proportion of publications and citations in both databases revealed that Gold OA journals only increased their proportion of publications but not the proportion of citations. Trends in the proportion of highly cited publications (top 1%) depicted that OA journals were unable to exceed of this expected 1% in the 11 years under analysis.

[1]  Salvatore Mele,et al.  Converting the Literature of a Scientific Field to Open Access through Global Collaboration: The Experience of SCOAP3 in Particle Physics , 2018, Publ..

[2]  M. Erfanmanesh.  Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus , 2017 .

[3]  B. Björk.  Growth of hybrid open access, 2009–2016 , 2017, PeerJ.

[4]  Richard K. Johnson.  Open Access , 2005 .

[5]  Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al.  A further step forward in measuring journals' scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Nicky Agate.  Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication , 2019 .

[7]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A review of theory and practice in scientometrics , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al.  The dark side of open access in Google and Google Scholar: the case of Latin-American repositories , 2014, Scientometrics.

[10]  Ding-wei Huang.  Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Gianfranco Ennas,et al.  Features of top-rated gold open access journals: An analysis of the scopus database , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[12]  J. Bohannon.  Who's afraid of peer review? , 2013, Science.

[13]  Richard Van Noorden.  Open access: The true cost of science publishing , 2013, Nature.

[14]  B. Björk.  Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges , 2017, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[15]  J. A. T. Silva,et al.  Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers , 2019, The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

[16]  C. Haug.  No Free Lunch - What Price Plan S for Scientific Publishing? , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Glenn S. McGuigan,et al.  The Business of Academic Publishing: A Strategic Analysis of the Academic Journal Publishing Industr , 2008 .

[18]  Vincent A. Traag,et al.  Persistence of journal hierarchy in open access publishing , 2019, International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics.

[19]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The effect of "open access" on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Lisa A. Ennis.  The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Peter Suber,et al.  Gratis and libre open access , 2008 .

[22]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The citation advantage of open-access articles , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[24]  Pablo Dorta-González,et al.  Prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the Scopus database , 2017, ArXiv.

[25]  Juho Lindman,et al.  availability : a study of articles published in eight top information systems journals ( 2010 – 2014 ) , 2016 .

[26]  Jelte M. Wicherts,et al.  Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals , 2016, PloS one.

[27]  Éric Archambault,et al.  Research impact of paywalled versus open access papers , 2016 .

[28]  M. Wacha,et al.  The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2017 .

[29]  Nicholas Joint.  The Antaeus column: does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian's perspective , 2009 .

[30]  Bianca Kramer,et al.  Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication: Report of the Expert Group to the European Commission , 2019 .

[31]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  C. Walt.  Gold Open Access Journals 2011-2015 , 2016 .

[33]  Elizabeth Gadd,et al.  What does ‘green’ open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self-archiving policies , 2019, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Roger Watson,et al.  Time to plan for Plan S , 2019, Nursing open.

[35]  H. Worthington,et al.  Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry. , 2017, Journal of dentistry.

[36]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[37]  S. Lawrence.  Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact , 2001, Nature.

[38]  L. Fésüs,et al.  Will Plan S put learned societies in jeopardy? , 2019, FEBS letters.

[39]  Is open access sufficient? A review of the quality of open-access nursing journals. , 2015, International journal of mental health nursing.

[40]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Journal of Informetrics , 2022 .

[41]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  How subscription‐based scholarly journals can convert to open access: A review of approaches , 2016, Learn. Publ..

[42]  Christian Gumpenberger,et al.  On the impact of Gold Open Access journals , 2013, Scientometrics.

[43]  Claire Creaser,et al.  The influence of journal publisher characteristics on open access policy trends , 2018, Scientometrics.

[44]  M. McNutt.  Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Éric Archambault,et al.  Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996-2013 , 2014 .

[46]  Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al.  Spanish researchers’ opinions, attitudes and practices towards open access publishing , 2017 .

[47]  S. Boccia,et al.  Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation , 2016, PloS one.

[48]  Pablo Dorta-González,et al.  Reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context: an analysis of the subject categories in the Web of Science database 2009–2014 , 2017, Scientometrics.