Attributing equity gaps to course structure in introductory physics

We add to a growing literature suggesting that demographic grade gaps should be attributed to biases embedded in the courses themselves. Changes in the structure of two different introductory physics classes were made while leaving the topics covered and the level of coverage unchanged. First, a class where conceptual issues were studied before doing any complicated calculations had zero final exam grade gap between students from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups and their peers. Next, four classes that offered students a retake exam each week between the regular bi-weekly exams during the term had zero gender gap in course grades. Our analysis indicates that demographic grade gaps can be attributed to the course structure (a Course Deficit Model) rather than to student preparation (a Student Deficit Model).

[1]  S. Salehi,et al.  Equitable approach to introductory calculus-based physics courses focused on problem solving , 2022, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[2]  Noam Brown,et al.  Do introductory courses disproportionately drive minoritized students out of STEM pathways? , 2022, PNAS nexus.

[3]  H. Thorp Inclusion doesn’t lower standards , 2022, Science.

[4]  C. Paul,et al.  Percent Grade Scale Amplifies Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Introductory Physics , 2022, 2203.02626.

[5]  Timothy J Stelzer,et al.  Impact of broad categorization on statistical results: How underrepresented minority designation can mask the struggles of both Asian American and African American students , 2021 .

[6]  Wendell H. Potter,et al.  Gender-grade-gap zeroed out under a specific intro-physics assessment regime , 2021, 2102.10451.

[7]  Cabot Zabriskie,et al.  Mediational effect of prior preparation on performance differences of students underrepresented in physics , 2021 .

[8]  A. Heckler,et al.  Grades, grade component weighting, and demographic disparities in introductory physics , 2020 .

[9]  Jared Ashcroft,et al.  Making STEM Equitable: An Active Learning Approach to Closing the Achievement Gap , 2020 .

[10]  Elli J. Theobald,et al.  Reducing achievement gaps in undergraduate general chemistry could lift underrepresented students into a “hyperpersistent zone” , 2020, Science Advances.

[11]  Joseph A. Soares The Scandal of Standardized Tests: Why We Need to Drop the SAT and ACT. , 2020 .

[12]  Claire R. Williams,et al.  Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics , 2019, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[14]  W. Blake Grades , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[15]  C. Paul,et al.  Relative impacts of different grade scales on student success in introductory physics , 2019, 1903.06747.

[16]  M. Murphy,et al.  STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes , 2019, Science Advances.

[17]  Jayson M. Nissen,et al.  Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: A review of hierarchical linear modeling , 2018, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[18]  C. Ballen,et al.  Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable? , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  Carl Wieman,et al.  Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning , 2017, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  Saul Geiser NORM-REFERENCED TESTS AND RACE-BLIND ADMISSIONS: The Case for Eliminating the SAT and ACT at the University of California by Saul Geiser, UC Berkeley CSHE 15.17 (December 2017) , 2017 .

[21]  S. Kanim,et al.  Demographics of physics education research , 2017, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[22]  Gay Stewart,et al.  Gender Fairness within the Force Concept Inventory , 2017, 1709.00437.

[23]  D. J. Webb Concepts first: A course with improved educational outcomes and parity for underrepresented minority groups , 2017 .

[24]  Sarah B. McKagan,et al.  Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent,and what factors influence the gap? , 2013, 1307.0912.

[25]  Howard T. Everson,et al.  Race, Poverty and SAT Scores: Modeling the Influences of Family Income on Black and White High School Students’ SAT Performance , 2013, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[26]  Eric Brewe,et al.  Impact of equity models and statistical measures on interpretations of educational reform , 2012 .

[27]  Wendell H. Potter,et al.  Sixteen years of Collaborative Learning through Active Sense-making in Physics (CLASP) at UC Davis , 2012, 1205.6970.

[28]  Rochelle Gutiérrez Research Commentary: A Gap-Gazing Fetish in Mathematics Education? Problematizing Research on the Achievement Gap , 2008, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[29]  Richard R. Valencia The Evolution of Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice. The Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy. , 1997 .

[30]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[31]  Loredana Cornero,et al.  Women , 1893, The Hospital.

[32]  Rochelle Gutiérrez Context Matters: How Should We Conceptualize Equity in Mathematics Education? , 2012 .

[33]  Joseph A. Soares SAT wars : the case for test-optional admissions , 2012 .