Monitoring Response to Antiangiogenic Treatment and Predicting Outcomes in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Image Biomarkers, CT Perfusion, Tumor Density, and Tumor Size (RECIST)

Purpose:Our aim was to investigate the hypothesis that the CT perfusion (CTP) is a more sensitive image biomarker when compared with tumor burden (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) and tumor density (HU) for monitoring treatment changes and for predicting long-term outcome in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with a combination of antiangiogenic treatment and chemotherapy. Material and Methods:In this phase II clinical trial, 33 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled and 23 were included in the current study. A diagnostic dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT and perfusion CT was performed at baseline and days 10 to 12 after initiation of antiangiogenic treatment (Bevacizumab). The patients subsequently received bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX-B) and contrast-enhanced CT was performed at the end of treatment (after completing 3 cycles of GEMOX-B chemotherapy) and after every 8 week until there was evidence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The CTP protocol included a targeted dynamic cine acquisition for 25 to 30 seconds after 50 to 70 mL of iodinated contrast media injection at 5 to 7 mL/s. The CTP parameters were compared with tumor size (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST 1.1) and density measurements (HU) before and after treatment and correlated with patient's outcome in groups with and without tumor thrombus. A one-sided P value was calculated and the Bonferroni correction was used to address the issue of multiple comparisons. Results:On days 10 to 12 after initiation of bevacizumab, significant decrease in CTP parameters was noted (P < 0.005). There was a mild reduction in mean tumor density (P = 0.016) without any significant change in mean tumor size. Tumors with higher baseline mean transit time values on CTP correlated with favorable clinical outcome (partial response and stable disease) and had better 6 months progression-free survival (P = 0.002 and P = 0.005, respectively). The baseline transfer constant (Ktrans) of responders (1425.19 ± 609.47 mL/1000 mL/min) was significantly higher than that of nonresponders (935.96 ± 189.47 mL/1000 mL/min). The tumor thrombus in the portal vein demonstrated baseline perfusion values and post-treatment change values similar to the HCC. Conclusion:In advanced HCC, CTP is a more sensitive image biomarker for monitoring early antiangiogenic treatment effects as well as in predicting outcome at the end of treatment and progression-free survival as compared with RECIST and tumor density.

[1]  C. Chatwin,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Texture Analysis of the Liver: Initial Assessment in Colorectal Cancer , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[2]  S. Heiland,et al.  Where Contrast Agent Concentration Really Matters – A Comparison of CT and MRI , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: comparison with original RECIST and impact on assessment of tumor response to targeted therapy. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Kristina M. Cook,et al.  Angiogenesis Inhibitors: Current Strategies and Future Prospects , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Q. Huang,et al.  Experimental Study on Angiogenesis in a Rabbit VX2 Early Liver Tumour by Perfusion Computed Tomography , 2010, The Journal of international medical research.

[8]  Sharon E Ungersma,et al.  Vessel imaging with viable tumor analysis for quantification of tumor angiogenesis , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  320-multidetector row whole-head dynamic subtracted CT angiography and whole-brain CT perfusion before and after carotid artery stenting: technical note. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[10]  V. Tronnier,et al.  Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of intra-axial brain tumours: differentiation of high-grade gliomas from primary CNS lymphomas , 2010, European Radiology.

[11]  Min Uk Kim,et al.  The Role of Perfusion CT as a Follow-up Modality After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: An Experimental Study in a Rabbit Model , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[12]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography Liver Perfusion Imaging Using Dynamic Spiral Scanning With Variable Pitch: Feasibility and Initial Results in Patients With Cancer Metastases , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[13]  C. Ng,et al.  Reproducibility of perfusion parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of lung and liver tumors: effect on estimates of patient sample size in clinical trials and on individual patient responses. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Riccardo Lencioni,et al.  Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2010, Seminars in liver disease.

[15]  M. Rosen Use of modified RECIST criteria to improve response assessment in targeted therapies: Challenges and opportunities , 2010, Cancer biology & therapy.

[16]  G. Jayson,et al.  Biomarkers of angiogenesis and their role in the development of VEGF inhibitors , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  X. Tao,et al.  Wahl zwischen PET-CT oder CT in der Lungenkrebsdiagnostik , 2010 .

[18]  Chaan S Ng,et al.  Perfusion CT in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  T. Jiang,et al.  How to choose PET-CT or CT in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Practical experience in China. , 2010, NuclearMedicine.

[20]  Yang Li,et al.  Perfusion computed tomography evaluation of angiogenesis in liver cancer , 2010, European Radiology.

[21]  O. Bouché,et al.  Imaging techniques to evaluate the response to treatment in oncology: current standards and perspectives. , 2009, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[22]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of neoadjuvant bevacizumab, radiation therapy, and fluorouracil in rectal cancer: a multidisciplinary phase II study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Ernst Klotz,et al.  Perfusion CT: noninvasive surrogate marker for stratification of pancreatic cancer response to concurrent chemo- and radiation therapy. , 2009, Radiology.

[24]  D. Sahani,et al.  Body perfusion CT: technique, clinical applications, and advances. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[25]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[26]  S Nahum Goldberg,et al.  Perfusion MDCT enables early detection of therapeutic response to antiangiogenic therapy. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer tumor vascular parameters by using perfusion CT: influence of tumor region of interest. , 2008, Radiology.

[28]  N. Holalkere,et al.  Early antiangiogenic activity of bevacizumab evaluated by computed tomography perfusion scan in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2008, The oncologist.

[29]  N. Holalkere,et al.  Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: CT perfusion of liver and tumor tissue--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[30]  Haesun Choi,et al.  Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  V. Goh,et al.  Differentiation between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer: quantitative CT perfusion measurements versus morphologic criteria--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[32]  Alona Muzikansky,et al.  Phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  C. Charnsangavej,et al.  Functional CT quantification of tumor perfusion after transhepatic arterial embolization in a rat model. , 2005, Radiology.

[34]  Lee M Ellis,et al.  Functional CT for quantifying tumor perfusion in antiangiogenic therapy in a rat model. , 2005, Radiology.

[35]  D. Sahani,et al.  Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. , 2005, Radiology.

[36]  L Pagliaro,et al.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. , 2001, Journal of hepatology.

[37]  Y. Inaba,et al.  Increased hepatic arterial blood flow after decreased portal supply to the liver parenchyma owing to intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt: angiographic demonstration using helical CT. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  H. Fukuda,et al.  European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL) consensus recommendations for the management of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas Blood 2008; 112(5):1600-9 , 2022 .

[39]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[41]  M. Dumont,et al.  European Association for the Study of the Liver , 1971 .