Probing structure-function relationships of the DNA polymerase alpha-associated zinc-finger protein using computational approaches.

We present the application of a method for protein structure prediction to aid the determination of structure-function relationships by experiment. The structure prediction method was rigourously tested by making blind predictions at the third meeting on the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure methods (CASP3). The method is a combined hierarchical approach involving exhaustive enumeration of all possible folds of a small protein sequence on a tetrahedral lattice. A set of filters, primarily in the form of discriminatory functions, are applied to these conformations. As the filters are applied, greater detail is added to the models resulting in a handful of all-atom "final" conformations. Encouraged by the results at CASP3, we used our approach to help solve a practical biological problem: the prediction of the structure and function of the 67-residue C-terminal zinc-finger region of the DNA polymerase alpha-associated zinc-finger (PAZ) protein. We discuss how the prediction points to a novel function relative to the sequence homologs, in conjunction with evidence from experiment, and how the predicted structure is guiding further experimental studies. This work represents a move from the theoretical realm to actual application of structure prediction methods for gaining unique insight to guide experimental biologists.

[1]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  Ab initio protein structure prediction using a combined hierarchical approach , 1999, Proteins.

[2]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  C Kooperberg,et al.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  R. Samudrala,et al.  An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  J. Goldberg Structural and Functional Analysis of the ARF1–ARFGAP Complex Reveals a Role for Coatomer in GTP Hydrolysis , 1999, Cell.

[6]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server , 2000, Bioinform..

[7]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  A Combined Approach for Ab Initio Construction of Low Resolution Protein Tertiary Structures from Sequence , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[8]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  Distance geometry generates native‐like folds for small helical proteins using the consensus distances of predicted protein structures , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  M. Levitt,et al.  Refinement of protein conformations using a macromolecular energy minimization procedure. , 1969, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  M. Levitt,et al.  Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution , 1995 .

[11]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[13]  E S Huang,et al.  Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  M. Levitt,et al.  Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  M. Levitt,et al.  A lattice model for protein structure prediction at low resolution. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  R Samudrala,et al.  Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[18]  E. Huang,et al.  Are predicted structures good enough to preserve functional sites? , 1999, Structure.

[19]  M. James,et al.  A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins * , 1995, Proteins.

[20]  A. Dunker The pacific symposium on biocomputing , 1998 .

[21]  M. Levitt,et al.  The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.