ONOFIC approach: low power high speed nanoscale VLSI circuits design

Shrinking in the device dimensions increases the device density on the chip and thus reducing the overall chip area requirement for logic implementation. Minimising the chip area is not a lonely optimisation performance factor for a VLSI chip designer. The other equally important performance parameters such that power dissipation and propagation delay are the thinkable facts for a designer. The focusable part of power dissipation is the huge leakage current in deep submicron (DSM) regime. Many leakage reduction techniques are applied to reduce the leakage current in the DSM regime but they have own limitations. Our proposed on/off logic (ONOFIC) approach gives an excellent settlement between power dissipation and propagation delay for designing the nanoscale CMOS circuits. It uses extra insertion of two transistors (an NMOS and a PMOS) within the logic block. The exact on/off level of the ONOFIC block improves the power dissipation and propagation delay of the logic circuits. In this article, ONOFIC approach is compared with the LECTOR leakage reduction technique and output results show that our proposed approach significantly reduces the power dissipation and enhancing the speed of the logic circuits with superior power-delay product.

[1]  Yingchieh Ho,et al.  Design of a Subthreshold-Supply Bootstrapped CMOS Inverter Based on an Active Leakage-Current Reduction Technique , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[2]  Gaetano Palumbo,et al.  An Accurate Ultra-Compact I–V Model for Nanometer MOS Transistors With Applications on Digital Circuits , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[3]  Dragos Nicolae Vizireanu,et al.  Is “five-point” estimation better than “three-point” estimation? , 2013 .

[4]  Shin Min Kang,et al.  CMOS Digital Integrated Cir-cuits: Analysis and Design , 2002 .

[5]  N. Ranganathan,et al.  LECTOR: a technique for leakage reduction in CMOS circuits , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[6]  Mohab Anis,et al.  Design-Specific Optimization Considering Supply and Threshold Voltage Variations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Mohd. Hasan,et al.  Variability aware low leakage reliable SRAM cell design technique , 2012, Microelectron. Reliab..

[8]  Shin'ichiro Mutoh,et al.  1-V power supply high-speed digital circuit technology with multithreshold-voltage CMOS , 1995, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[9]  D N Vizireanu,et al.  Simple, fast and accurate eight points amplitude estimation method of sinusoidal signals for DSP based instrumentation , 2012 .

[10]  Shekhar Y. Borkar,et al.  Design challenges of technology scaling , 1999, IEEE Micro.

[11]  Ka Nang Leung,et al.  A gain-optimising regulated charge pump , 2011 .

[12]  Michael Franz,et al.  Power reduction techniques for microprocessor systems , 2005, CSUR.

[13]  T. Sakurai,et al.  A super cut-off CMOS (SCCMOS) scheme for 0.5-V supply voltage with picoampere stand-by current , 2000, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[14]  Chen Wu,et al.  Integrated SRAM compiler with clamping diode to reduce leakage and dynamic power in nano-CMOS process , 2012 .

[15]  Shyam Akashe,et al.  High density and low leakage current based SRAM cell using 45 nm technology , 2013 .

[16]  Simona Halunga,et al.  Analytical formula for three points sinusoidal signals amplitude estimation errors , 2012 .

[17]  Suhwan Kim,et al.  A Multi-Mode Power Gating Structure for Low-Voltage Deep-Submicron CMOS ICs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs.

[18]  Tao Li,et al.  Full-chip leakage analysis for 65 nm CMOS technology and beyond , 2010, Integr..

[19]  D N Vizireanu,et al.  A fast, simple and accurate time-varying frequency estimation method for single-phase electric power systems , 2012 .

[20]  Anantha Chandrakasan,et al.  Scaling of stack effect and its application for leakage reduction , 2001, ISLPED'01: Proceedings of the 2001 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8581).

[21]  Massoud Pedram,et al.  Leakage current reduction in CMOS VLSI circuits by input vector control , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[22]  Manisha Pattanaik,et al.  Enhanced I ON/I OFF in ultra deep submicron CMOS devices using grooved nMOSFETs in comparison to planar nMOSFET , 2012 .

[23]  Kang Sung-Mo CMOS digital integrated circuits: analysis and design / Sung-Mo (Steve) Kang, Yusuf Leblebici , 2003 .

[24]  Odysseas Koufopavlou,et al.  A comparative study of CMOS circuit design styles for low-power high-speed VLSI circuits , 1998 .

[25]  Robert H. Dennard,et al.  A perspective on today’s scaling challenges and possible future directions , 2007 .

[26]  Jun-Cheol Park,et al.  Sleepy Stack Leakage Reduction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[27]  S. D. Pable,et al.  A novel robust FPGA routing switch box design for ultra low power applications , 2012 .

[28]  Hiroshi Iwai,et al.  On the scaling issues and high-κ replacement of ultrathin gate dielectrics for nanoscale MOS transistors , 2006 .