Simultaneous and Sequential Contributions to Step-Level Public Goods: One vs. Two Provision Levels

In a step-level public-good experiment, we investigate how the order of moves (si- multaneous vs. sequential) and the number of step levels (one vs. two) aects public-good provision in a two-player game. We

[1]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Price-Dependent Demand in Spatial Models , 2012 .

[2]  Ido Erev,et al.  Provision of Step-Level Public Goods , 1990 .

[3]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[4]  C. Cadsby,et al.  Choosing between a socially efficient and free-riding equilibrium: Nurses versus economics and business students , 1998 .

[5]  Julia Graf,et al.  The effects of rebate contracts on the health care system , 2014, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[6]  Kristian Giesen,et al.  City Age and City Size , 2014 .

[7]  A. Barth,et al.  How large is the magnitude of fixed-mobile call substitution? Empirical evidence from 16 Europen countries , 2012 .

[8]  Marc Bataille,et al.  Intermodal competition on some routes in transportation networks: The case of inter urban buses and railways , 2013 .

[9]  Irene Bertschek,et al.  More Bits – More Bucks? Measuring the Impact of Broadband Internet on Firm Performance , 2013 .

[10]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Fairness and the Optimal Allocation of Ownership Rights , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Miguel A. Fonseca,et al.  Explicit vs. Tacit Collusion – The Impact of Communication in Oligopoly Experiments , 2012 .

[12]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Private Protection Against Crime When Property Value is Private Information , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study , 2007 .

[14]  Thomas Riechmann,et al.  Inequity Aversion and Individual Behavior in Public Good Games: An Experimental Investigation , 2007 .

[15]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Regulating Advertising in the Presence of Public Service Broadcasting , 2012 .

[16]  Justus Haucap,et al.  The Effects of Gasoline Price Regulations: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[17]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Status Concerns as a Motive for Crime? , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  Mehmet Karaçuka,et al.  Consumer choice and local network effects in mobile telecommunications in Turkey , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel Coublucq,et al.  Demand Estimation with Selection Bias: A Dynamic Game Approach with an Application to the US Railroad Industry , 2013 .

[20]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  The Effect of Leadership in a Public Bad Experiment , 2000 .

[21]  S. Huck,et al.  Stackelberg Beats Cournot: On Collusion and Efficiency in Experimental Markets , 2001 .

[22]  N. Jentzsch,et al.  Targeted pricing and customer data sharing among rivals , 2013 .

[23]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  Excess Capacity and Pricing in Bertrand-Edgeworth Markets: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[24]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Strategic obfuscation and consumer protection policy in financial markets: Theory and experimental evidence , 2012 .

[25]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  Leading by Example to Protect the Environment: Do the Costs of Leading Matter? , 2011 .

[26]  Tomaso Duso,et al.  Ex-Post Merger Evaluation in the UK Retail Market for Books , 2013 .

[27]  M. V. Levati,et al.  Leading by Example in a Public Goods Experiment with Heterogeneity and Incomplete Information , 2007 .

[28]  Dirk Sliwka,et al.  Inequality, Inequity Aversion, and the Provision of Public Goods , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  T. Offerman,et al.  Chapter 86 Explaining the Comparative Statics in Step-Level Public Good Games , 2008 .

[30]  C. Cadsby,et al.  Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: experimental evidence , 1999 .

[31]  Adriaan R. Soetevent,et al.  Anonymity in Giving in a Natural Context : A Field Experiment in 30 Churches , 2005 .

[32]  Volker Benndorf,et al.  Competition in the Workplace: An Experimental Investigation , 2012 .

[33]  Tomaso Duso,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of the 2004 EU Merger Policy Reform , 2013 .

[34]  Christian Wey,et al.  The Effects of Remedies on Merger Activity in Oligopoly , 2012 .

[35]  Georg Clemens,et al.  Rebels without a clue? Experimental evidence on partial cartels , 2013 .

[36]  Thomas D. Jeitschko.  NYSE Changing Hands: Antitrust and Attempted Acquisitions of an Erstwhile Monopoly , 2013 .

[37]  Tobias Regner,et al.  Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the Internet: A natural field experiment , 2012 .

[38]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Investment behavior in a constrained dictator game , 2012 .

[39]  Torben Stühmeier,et al.  Roaming and investments in the mobile internet market , 2012 .

[40]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  Mergers, managerial incentives, and efficiencies , 2013 .

[41]  Geza Sapi,et al.  Consumer Flexibility, Data Quality and Targeted Pricing , 2013 .

[42]  A. Barth,et al.  Does the growth of mobile markets cause the demise of fixed networks? - Evidence from the European Union , 2014 .

[43]  Dennis Rickert,et al.  Inter-Format Competition Among Retailers - The Role of Private Label Products in Market Delineation. , 2013 .

[44]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  The Impact of Timing on Bidding Behavior in Procurement Auctions of Contracts with Private Costs , 2010 .

[45]  Dennis Rickert,et al.  Bargaining power in manufacturer-retailer relationships , 2013 .

[46]  Tobias Wenzel,et al.  Piracy in a two-sided software market ☆ , 2013 .

[47]  Wolfgang Dauth,et al.  The Rise of the East and the Far East: German Labor Markets and Trade Integration , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[48]  Ulrich Heimeshoff,et al.  Pull-forward effects in the German car scrappage scheme: A time series approach , 2012 .

[49]  Matthew J. Hashim,et al.  Information Targeting and Coordination: An Experimental Study , 2011, WEIS.

[50]  Veit Böckers,et al.  The green game changer: An empirical assessment of the effects of wind and solar power on the merit order , 2013 .

[51]  Christian Wey,et al.  Input Price Discrimination (Bans), Entry and Welfare , 2013 .

[52]  Gerhard Riener,et al.  Heterogeneous treatment effects in groups , 2013 .

[53]  Andreas Stiehler,et al.  A Comparison of Punishment Rules in Repeated Public Good Games , 2003 .

[54]  S. Gächter,et al.  Who Makes a Good Leader? Cooperativeness, Optimism, and Leading‐By‐Example , 2012 .

[55]  Thomas D. Jeitschko,et al.  Adverse Effects of Patent Pooling on Product Development and Commercialization , 2012 .

[56]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  More Ads, More Revs? Is there a Media Bias in the Likelihood to be Reviewed? , 2012 .

[57]  Michael Berlemann,et al.  Which Factors Drive the Decision to Boycott and Opt Out of Research Rankings? A Note , 2012 .

[58]  Susan K. Laury,et al.  The voluntary provision of a pure public good with diminishing marginal returns , 1999 .

[59]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[60]  L. Vesterlund,et al.  After You - Endogenous Sequencing in Voluntary Contribution Games , 2005 .

[61]  Brit Grosskopf,et al.  Simultaneous versus sequential public good provision and the role of refunds -- An experimental study , 2009 .

[62]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  The Effects of Seed Money and Refunds on Charitable Giving: Experimental Evidence from a University Capital Campaign , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[63]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Media Bias and Advertising: Evidence from a German Car Magazine , 2014 .

[64]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Toward an Economic Theory of Leadership: Leading by Example , 1997 .

[65]  Geza Sapi,et al.  Bargaining, vertical mergers and entry , 2012 .

[66]  Hanna Hottenrott,et al.  Policy-Induced Environmental Technology and Inventive Efforts: Is There a Crowding Out? , 2013, Industry and Innovation.

[67]  J. Carpenter.  Bargaining Outcomes as the Result of Coordinated Expectations , 2003 .

[68]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  Leading by Example to Protect the Environment , 2011 .

[69]  J. Harsanyi.  Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points , 1973 .

[70]  Susan K. Laury,et al.  Voluntary contributions to a multiple threshold public good , 2001 .

[71]  Wieland Müller,et al.  Output Commitment Through Product Bundling: Experimental Evidence , 2013 .

[72]  L. Vesterlund,et al.  After you--endogenous sequencing in voluntary contribution games , 2005 .

[73]  Anabela Botelho,et al.  Testing static game theory with dynamic experiments: A case study of public goods , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[74]  Tim Friehe,et al.  Cheap Talk About the Detection Probability , 2012 .

[75]  Annika Herr,et al.  Pharmaceutical prices under regulation: Tiered co-payments and reference pricing in Germany , 2012 .

[76]  C. Cadsby,et al.  Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: Experimental evidence , 1998 .

[77]  Gordon J. Klein,et al.  How regulation affects network and service quality in related markets , 2012 .

[78]  Ralf Dewenter,et al.  Hospital Market Concentration and Discrimination of Patients , 2013 .

[79]  Hans-Theo Normann,et al.  A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding Preferences , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[80]  Vanessa von Schlippenbach,et al.  One‐Stop Shopping as a Cause of Slotting Fees: A Rent‐Shifting Mechanism , 2013 .

[81]  Robert McClelland,et al.  SEQUENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS , 2007 .

[82]  Paul M. Brown,et al.  What Makes an Allocation Fair? Some Experimental Evidence , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[83]  J. Andreoni.  Toward a Theory of Charitable Fundraising , 1998 .

[84]  Isabel Teichmann,et al.  The Strategic Use of Private Quality Standards in Food Supply Chains , 2011 .

[85]  Rupert Sausgruber,et al.  Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[86]  James Andreoni,et al.  Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising , 2006 .

[87]  M. Willinger,et al.  Vanishing Leadership and Declining Reciprocity in a Sequential Contribution Experiment , 2012 .

[88]  Oliver Falck,et al.  Why are Educated and Risk-Loving Persons More Mobile Across Regions? , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[89]  Paolo Buccirossi,et al.  They Played the Merger Game: A Retrospective Analysis in the UK Videogames Market , 2013 .

[90]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Sequential versus Simultaneous Contributions to Public Goods: Experimental Evidence , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[91]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[92]  Fatima Lambarraa,et al.  On the Norms of Charitable Giving in Islam: A Field Experiment , 2012 .

[93]  Amihai Glazer,et al.  A Signaling Explanation for Charity , 1996 .

[94]  Dragan Jovanovic,et al.  An equilibrium analysis of efficiency gains from mergers , 2012 .

[95]  Sabrina Teyssier.  Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games , 2009, Public Choice.