Seismic control of buildings with active tuned mass damper through interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller including soil–structure interaction

This paper presents the application of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller (IT2FLC) in ATMD for the response control of a building considering soil–structure interaction (SSI). One of the main constraints of the current fuzzy systems is their inability to consider uncertainty in fuzzy rules. Interval type-2 fuzzy systems have the ability to handle this deficiency. It also takes into account uncertainty in loading and structural behavior. To evaluate the influence of soil types on the behavior of structure, an 11-story shear building is used. This structure has been analyzed under the earthquake excitations recommended by the International Association of structural control (IASC) committee. The uncontrolled and controlled responses of structure with ATMD through IT2FLC are calculated with and without SSI effects. Numerical results indicate that SSI would significantly affect the structural response of the building. It is also found that when a structure is built on soft soil sites, the effectiveness of ATMD with IT2FLC in the case of suppressing the structural response is increased.

[1]  J. Wolf.  Soil-structure-interaction analysis in time domain , 1988 .

[2]  Moon K. Kwak,et al.  Active vibration control of structure by Active Mass Damper and Multi-Modal Negative Acceleration Feedback control algorithm , 2017 .

[3]  Bijan Samali,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF AN ACTIVE MASS DRIVER SYSTEM ON A FIVE-STOREY MODEL USING A FUZZY CONTROLLER , 2006 .

[4]  Haijun Zhang,et al.  Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non‐stationary base excitation during earthquake , 2008 .

[5]  James T. P. Yao,et al.  CONCEPT OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 1972 .

[6]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Minimizing structural vibrations with absorbers , 1980 .

[7]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 fuzzy logic systems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[8]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 fuzzy logic systems: type-reduction , 1998, SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218).

[9]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  VIBRATION CONTROL OF BUILDINGS USING ATMD AGAINST EARTHQUAKE EXCITATIONS THROUGH INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER , 2014 .

[10]  Fabio Casciati,et al.  FUZZY CONTROL OF STRUCTURAL VIBRATION. AN ACTIVE MASS SYSTEM DRIVEN BY A FUZZY CONTROLLER , 1998 .

[11]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[12]  Rahmi Guclu,et al.  Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers , 2008 .

[13]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method , 2014 .

[14]  H. Shariatmadar,et al.  Optimum Parameters for Tuned Mass Damper Using Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE) Algorithm , 2015 .

[15]  Andrew Y. T. Leung,et al.  Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers , 2009 .

[16]  Mohamed Abdel-Rohman,et al.  Optimal design of active TMD for buildings control , 1984 .

[17]  Anooshiravan Farshidianfar,et al.  ABC optimization of TMD parameters for tall buildings with soil structure interaction , 2013 .

[18]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL USING ACTIVE TUNED MASS DAMPERS , 1980 .

[19]  Fabio Casciati,et al.  Controlling wind response through a fuzzy controller , 2004 .

[20]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[21]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set , 2001, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Gebrail Bekdaş,et al.  Optimum tuned mass damper design for preventing brittle fracture of RC buildings , 2013 .

[23]  Anooshiravan Farshidianfar,et al.  Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil–structure interaction , 2013 .

[24]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Reduction seismic response with heavily-damped vibration absorbers , 1985 .

[25]  Gebrail Bekdaş,et al.  ESTIMATING OPTIMUM PARAMETERS OF TUNED MASS DAMPERS USING HARMONY SEARCH , 2011 .

[26]  N. N. Karnik,et al.  Introduction to type-2 fuzzy logic systems , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[27]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Performance of a five-storey benchmark model using an active tuned mass damper and a fuzzy controller , 2003 .

[28]  N. K. Chandiramani,et al.  Semiactive Control of Earthquake/Wind Excited Buildings Using Output Feedback☆ , 2016 .

[29]  S. Pourzeynali,et al.  Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms , 2007 .

[30]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design , 2010 .