Design Sensitivity Analysis for Elastodynamic Systems

ABSTRACT An adjoint approach, derived from the reciprocal theorem and the theory of convolution, is used to formulate design sensitivities for linear elastodynamic systems. Variations of a general design functional are expressed in explicit form with respect to variations of all design variables; i.e., material properties, applied loads, prescribed boundary conditions, initial conditions, and shape. The design functional is a function of these explicit variables and the implicit response fields: displacement, velocity, acceleration, stress, strain, and reaction forces. The methodology incorporates the reciprocal theorem between a variation of the real system and its adjoint system. The convolution is employed in lieu of time mappings used in other approaches. In an example problem, the finite element method is utilized to calculate the shape sensitivities of a dynamically loaded plane-strain cantilever plate. These explicit sensitivities are compared with finite difference approximations to validate the f...

[1]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  First- and Second-Order Sensitivity Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Structures , 1986 .

[2]  Morton E. Gurtin,et al.  Variational principles for linear elastodynamics , 1964 .

[3]  David Gerald Phelan Shape Sensitivity Analysis and Computer-Aided Design of Nonlinear Structures , 1988 .

[4]  C. V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Structural Shape Optimization Using Penalty Functions , 1974 .

[5]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  First‐order design sensitivities for transient conduction problems by an adjoint method , 1989 .

[6]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Structural design sensitivity analysis with general boundary conditions: Dynamic problem , 1984 .

[7]  William Prager,et al.  Optimal structural design for given deflection , 1970 .

[8]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  On Structural Optimization , 1983 .

[9]  Alberto Taliercio,et al.  On the adjoint constitutive law in nonlinear elastic optimal design , 1987 .

[10]  Nai-Chien Huang On principle of stationary mutual complementary energy and its application to optimal structural design , 1971 .

[11]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  A modular approach for three-dimensional shape optimization of structures , 1987 .

[12]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  VARIATIONAL APPROACH TO SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN THERMOELASTICITY , 1987 .

[13]  William Prager,et al.  Problems of Optimal Structural Design , 1968 .

[14]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Elastic Structures , 1983 .

[15]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Recent Advances in Design Sensitivity Analysis and Its Use in Structural Design Process , 1988 .

[16]  William Prager,et al.  Optimal design of multi-purpose structures* , 1968 .

[17]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems , 1986 .

[18]  Krzysztof Dems,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN THERMAL PROBLEMS—I: VARIATION OF MATERIAL PARAMETERS WITHIN A FIXED DOMAIN , 1986 .

[19]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[20]  J. Arora,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response , 1984 .

[21]  Optimum design of structures through variational principles , 1973 .

[22]  G. A. Hegemier,et al.  A Variational Principle, the Finite Element Method, and Optimal Structural Design for Given Deflection , 1975 .

[23]  R. Haftka,et al.  Structural shape optimization — a survey , 1986 .