Role of sensorimotor areas in early detection of motor errors: An EEG and TMS study

Action execution is prone to errors and, while engaged in interaction, our brain is tuned to detect deviations from what one expects from other's action. Prior research has shown that Event-Related-Potentials (ERPs) are specifically modulated by the observation of action mistakes interfering with goal achievement. However, in complex and modular actions, embedded motor errors do not necessarily produce an immediate effect on the global goal. Here we dissociate embedded motor goals from global action goals by asking subjects to observe familiar but untrained knotting actions. During knotting an embedded motor error (i.e. the rope is inserted top-down instead of bottom-up during the formation of a loop) while not producing any immediate mistake, may strongly affect the final result. We found that embedded errors elicit in the observer specific early fronto-central negativity (120-180 ms). In a second experiment, we online administered exicitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over central (C3) or occipital (Oz) scalp locations, at the timing of the ERP components observed in the first experiment. C3 stimulation produced a significant improvement in embedded error discrimination performance. These results show that sensorimotor areas are instrumental in the early detection of embedded motor errors. We conclude that others' embedded errors provide fundamental cues which, inserted within a complex hierarchical action plan, might be used by the observer to anticipate whether an action will eventually fail.

[1]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Using Goal- and Grip-Related Information for Understanding the Correctness of Other’s Actions: An ERP Study , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  L. Craighero,et al.  Broca's Area in Language, Action, and Music , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. M. Aglioti,et al.  Electrocortical signatures of detecting errors in the actions of others: An EEG study in pianists, non-pianist musicians and musically naïve people , 2016, Neuroscience.

[4]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Mauchly Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal $n$-Variate Distribution , 1940 .

[6]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  The role of the motor system in discriminating normal and degraded speech sounds , 2012, Cortex.

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  J. Grèzes,et al.  Social Perception: Understanding Other People's Intentions and Emotions through their Actions , 2008 .

[9]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Alessandro D’Ausilio,et al.  Tongue corticospinal modulation during attended verbal stimuli: Priming and coarticulation effects , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  G. Novembre,et al.  Syntax in a pianist's hand: ERP signatures of “embodied” syntax processing in music , 2013, Cortex.

[12]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  The minimalist grammar of action , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Early modulation of intra-cortical inhibition during the observation of action mistakes , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[15]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Unavoidable errors: A spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[19]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action understanding and active inference , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: a combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker , 2018, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Ricarda I Schubotz,et al.  Surprisingly correct: Unexpectedness of observed actions activates the medial prefrontal cortex , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[25]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Broca's Area and the Hierarchical Organization of Human Behavior , 2006, Neuron.

[26]  D. Sammler,et al.  Distinct brain signatures of content and structure violation during action observation , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  M. Balconi,et al.  Feedback-Related Negativity (FRN) and P300 Are Sensitive to Temporal-Order Violation in Transitive Action Representation , 2015 .

[29]  Anthony J. Rissling,et al.  Electroencephalography (EEG) and Event‐Related Potentials (ERPs) with Human Participants , 2010, Current protocols in neuroscience.

[30]  A. Lingnau,et al.  Areas Recruited during Action Understanding Are Not Modulated by Auditory or Sign Language Experience , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Toward the Neural Basis of Processing Structure in Music , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Moritz M. Daum,et al.  Syntactical regularities of action sequences in the infant brain: when structure matters. , 2018, Developmental science.

[33]  Ricarda I. Schubotz,et al.  An event-related potential study on the observation of erroneous everyday actions , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. , 2007, Human movement science.

[35]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  ERP analysis of cognitive sequencing: a left anterior negativity related to structural transformation processing , 2000, Neuroreport.

[37]  Daniel von Rhein,et al.  Is Your Error My Concern? An Event-Related Potential Study on Own and Observed Error Detection in Cooperation and Competition , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[39]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  David Perruchoud,et al.  Beyond variability: Subjective timing and the neurophysiology of motor cognition , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  H. Huynh,et al.  Conditions under Which Mean Square Ratios in Repeated Measurements Designs Have Exact F-Distributions , 1970 .

[42]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[43]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Marelli,et al.  On the Mechanisms of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): How Brain State and Baseline Performance Level Determine Behavioral Effects of TMS , 2017, bioRxiv.

[45]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[46]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[47]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Prospective coding in event representation , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[48]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies , 2012, Brain and Language.

[49]  Hyeon-Ae Jeon,et al.  Hierarchical processing in the prefrontal cortex in a variety of cognitive domains , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[50]  P. Gilley,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Rapid Sensitivity to Syntactic Anomaly , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[51]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[52]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Interaction between Syntax Processing in Language and in Music: An ERP Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  P. Liddle,et al.  External Behavior Monitoring Mirrors Internal Behavior Monitoring , 2005 .

[54]  L. Fadiga,et al.  The Motor Somatotopy of Speech Perception , 2009, Current Biology.

[55]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[56]  R. Johansson,et al.  Action plans used in action observation , 2003, Nature.

[57]  Moritz M. Daum,et al.  The Ontogenesis of Action Syntax , 2019, Collabra: Psychology.