Prognostic Staging of Extensively Pretreated Patients with Advanced HIV-1 Disease

Abstract Purpose: Determinants of therapeutic success are poorly characterized in patients with extensive HAART experience. Positive prognostic factors (PPFs) in the TORO trials could serve as the basis for a prognostically meaningful staging of treatment-experienced patients initiating a new antiretroviral regimen. Method: In TORO, triple-class-experienced patients with viral load (VL) ≥5,000 copies/mL received an optimized background regimen of 3-5 antiretrovirals (based on treatment history and baseline resistance testing) ± enfuvirtide (n = 995). Clinically relevant baseline PPFs that were predictive of 48-week virologic outcomes were identified via multiple regression analyses. Results: The likelihood of VL <400 copies/mL at 48 weeks (ITT analysis) was greater for those patients who had baseline CD4 count ≥100 cells/mm3 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.5, 3.1); baseline VL <5 log10 copies/mL (OR 1.8; 95% CIs 1.2, 2.6); received ≤10 prior antiretrovirals (OR 2.4; 95% CIs 1.6, 3.4); or received ≥2 active antiretrovirals in their background treatment regimen (OR 2.3; 95% CIs 1.6, 3.3). Overall, 67% of triple-class-experienced patients who met all four prognostic criteria and received enfuvirtide achieved VL <400 copies/mL at 48 weeks vs. 43% for non-enfuvirtide patients (p < .05). Similar results were obtained when the analysis was done separately in each of the randomization arms of the study. Conclusion: Our findings provide guidance for physicians on expected outcomes in treatment-experienced patients and should be of value in their clinical management, as well as in stratifying participants in clinical trials involving treatment-experienced patients.

[1]  R. Haubrich Improved Virologic Response in Three-Class Experienced Patients When an Active Boosted Protease Inhibitor is Used with Enfuvirtide (ENF) , 2005 .

[2]  Christine Katlama,et al.  Efficacy of enfuvirtide in patients infected with drug-resistant HIV-1 in Europe and Australia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Montaner,et al.  Enfuvirtide, an HIV-1 fusion inhibitor, for drug-resistant HIV infection in North and South America. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Jonathan AC Sterne,et al.  Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies , 2002, The Lancet.

[5]  C. Sabin,et al.  Durability of HIV-1 viral suppression over 3.3 years with multi-drug antiretroviral therapy in previously drug-naive individuals , 2001, AIDS.

[6]  J. Montaner,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for previously treated patients. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  D. Katzenstein,et al.  Randomized study of saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virologic failure on indinavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 359. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[8]  J. Mellors,et al.  3-Year Suppression of HIV Viremia with Indinavir, Zidovudine, and Lamivudine , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  P. Volberding,et al.  Novel four-drug salvage treatment regimens after failure of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor-containing regimen: antiviral activity and correlation of baseline phenotypic drug susceptibility with virologic outcome. , 1999, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  D. Richman,et al.  Simultaneous vs sequential initiation of therapy with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine for HIV-1 infection: 100-week follow-up. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  S. Hammer,et al.  Prognostic value of baseline human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA measurement for disease progression in patients receiving nucleoside therapy. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.