Tissue structure modification in knee osteoarthritis by use of joint distraction: an open 1-year pilot study

Background Modification of joint tissue damage is challenging in late-stage osteoarthritis (OA). Few options are available for treating end-stage knee OA other than joint replacement. Objectives To examine whether joint distraction can effectively modify knee joint tissue damage and has the potential to delay prosthesis surgery. Methods 20 patients (<60 years) with tibiofemoral OA were treated surgically using joint distraction. Distraction (∼5 mm) was applied for 2 months using an external fixation frame. Tissue structure modification at 1 year of follow-up was evaluated radiographically (joint space width (JSW)), by MRI (segmentation of cartilage morphology) and by biochemical markers of collagen type II turnover, with operators blinded to time points. Clinical improvement was evaluated by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score. Results Radiography demonstrated an increase in mean and minimum JSW (2.7 to 3.6 mm and 1.0 to 1.9 mm; p<0.05 and <0.01). MRI revealed an increase in cartilage thickness (2.4 to 3.0 mm; p<0.001) and a decrease of denuded bone areas (22% to 5%; p<0.001). Collagen type II levels showed a trend towards increased synthesis (+103%; p<0.06) and decreased breakdown (−11%; p<0.08). The WOMAC index increased from 45 to 77 points, and VAS pain decreased from 73 to 31 mm (both p<0.001). Conclusions Joint distraction can induce tissue structure modification in knee OA and could result in clinical benefit. No current treatment is able to induce such changes. Larger, longer and randomised studies on joint distraction are warranted.

[1]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.

[2]  F. Eckstein,et al.  An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R. Bitton The economic burden of osteoarthritis. , 2009, The American journal of managed care.

[4]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  Measures of molecular composition and structure in osteoarthritis. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  A David Paltiel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  M. Dougados,et al.  Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of joint replacement for knee osteoarthritis: results from a large, 3-year, prospective EULAR study , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030 , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  James G Wright,et al.  Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. , 2008, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[9]  E. Losina,et al.  Joint space narrowing and Kellgren-Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: an analytic literature synthesis. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  E. Roos,et al.  Clinical update: treating osteoarthritis , 2007, The Lancet.

[11]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  J. Bijlsma,et al.  Prolonged clinical benefit from joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  W. B. van den Berg,et al.  Interaction of chondrocytes, extracellular matrix and growth factors: relevance for articular cartilage tissue engineering. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[14]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  R Burgkart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  T. Spector,et al.  Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  F. Lafeber,et al.  Beneficial effects of intermittent fluid pressure of low physiological magnitude on cartilage and inflammation in osteoarthritis. An in vitro study. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[18]  J. Bijlsma,et al.  Function of Stiff Joints May Be Restored by Ilizarov Joint Distraction , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  C. Elson,et al.  Alteration of cartilage metabolism by cells from osteoarthritic bone. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  J. Bijlsma,et al.  Can Ilizarov joint distraction delay the need for an arthrodesis of the ankle? A preliminary report. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  N. Bellamy Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[22]  F. Lafeber,et al.  Intermittent hydrostatic compressive force stimulates exclusively the proteoglycan synthesis of osteoarthritic human cartilage. , 1992, British journal of rheumatology.

[23]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  M A Viergever,et al.  Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA): a novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.