Nonlinear design of active suspensions

This article develops a new nonlinear backstepping design for the control of active suspension systems, which improves the inherent tradeoff between ride quality and suspension travel. The novelty is in the use of a nonlinear filter whose effective bandwidth depends on the magnitude of the suspension travel. This intentional introduction of nonlinearity, which is readily accommodated by backstepping, results in a design that is fundamentally different from previous ones: as the suspension travel changes, the controller smoothly shifts its focus between the conflicting objectives of ride comfort and rattlespace utilization, softening the suspension when suspension travel is small and stiffening it as it approaches the travel limits. Thus, our nonlinear design allows the closed-loop system to behave differently in different operating regions, thereby eliminating the dilemma of whether to use a soft or stiff suspension setting. The improvement achieved with our design is illustrated through comparative simulations.

[1]  Laura E. Ray,et al.  Robust Linear-Optimal Control Laws for Active Suspension Systems , 1992 .

[2]  A. G. Thompson,et al.  An Active Suspension with Optimal Linear State Feedback , 1976 .

[3]  Tetsuro Butsuen,et al.  Invariant Properties of Automotive Suspensions , 1990 .

[4]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  Alternative Control Laws for Automotive Active Suspensions , 1989 .

[5]  K. C. Cheok,et al.  An application of explicit self-tuning controller to vehicle active suspension systems , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  I. Kanellakopoulos,et al.  A toolkit for nonlinear feedback design , 1992 .

[7]  Jung-Shan Lin,et al.  Adaptive Nonlinear Control in Active Suspensions , 1996 .

[8]  D. Hrovat,et al.  Optimal active suspension structures for quarter-car vehicle models , 1990, Autom..

[9]  J. K. Hedrick,et al.  Nonlinear Control of a Quarter Car Active Suspension , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[10]  Naoto Fukushima,et al.  An active suspension employing an electrohydraulic pressure control system , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Nonlinear and adaptive control de-sign , 1995 .

[12]  Wayne R. Anderson Controlling electrohydraulic systems: E.O. Doebelin dept of mechanical engineering, Ohio state university, Columbus, OH 43210, U.S.A , 1988, Autom..

[13]  D. Hrovat,et al.  Influence of unsprung weight on vehicle ride quality , 1988 .

[14]  A. G. Thompson Design of Active Suspensions , 1970 .

[15]  H. E. Merritt,et al.  Hydraulic Control Systems , 1991 .

[16]  Andrew G. Alleyne,et al.  Application of Nonlinear Control Theory to Electronically Controlled Suspensions , 1993 .

[17]  Davorin David Hrovat Applications of Optimal Control to Advanced Automotive Suspension Design , 1993 .

[18]  A G Thompson Optimal and Suboptimal Linear Active Suspensions for Road Vehicles , 1984 .

[19]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Theoretical Limitations in Active Vehicle Suspensions , 1986 .