Detection of a locked zone at depth on the Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas Fault

The Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas fault is transitional in character between the creeping segment of the fault to the northwest and the locked Carrizo Plain segment to the southeast. The rate of shallow fault slip decreases from 25–30 mm/yr northwest of the epicenter of the 1966 Parkfield earthquake to zero at the southeastern end of the 1966 rupture zone. Data from a network of trilateration lines spanning the San Andreas fault near Parkfield and extending to the Pacific coast near San Luis Obispo shed light on the rate of fault slip at depth since the 1966 earthquake. In this study, average rates of line length change and shallow fault slip were inverted to determine the slip rate at depth on the Parkfield fault segment. The fault is taken to be a vertical surface with unknown distribution of strike-slip displacement in an elastic half-space. A striking result of the inversions is that all solutions providing acceptable fits to the data exhibit a locked zone essentially coincident with the rupture surface of the 1966 Parkfield earthquake. The data require that the locked zone extend nearly as far north as the 1966 epicenter; however, the vertical extent of the locked zone is not well resolved. Over much of the Parkfield segment the fault is slipping faster at the earth's surface than it is at seismogenic depths. In order to fit the trilateration measurements it is necessary to include a component of contraction normal to the trend of the San Andreas. The inversion results suggest a spatially uniform normal strain of −0.06 μstrain/yr. The orientation of the contraction is compatible with geologic and seismic evidence of active folding and reverse faulting in the region. The magnitude of the contraction is consistent with convergence rates inferred from global plate motion models.

[1]  J. Steketee,et al.  SOME GEOPHYSICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE ELASTICITY THEORY OF DISLOCATIONS , 1958 .

[2]  M. A. Chinnery.  The deformation of the ground around surface faults , 1961 .

[3]  M. Wyss,et al.  DISPLACEMENT ON THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT SUBSEQUENT TO THE 1966 PARKFIELD EARTHQUAKE , 1968 .

[4]  M. E. O'neill,et al.  Aftershocks of the 1966 Parkfield-Cholame, California, earthquake: A detailed study , 1970 .

[5]  K. Rybicki.  The elastic residual field of a very long strike-slip fault in the presence of a discontinuity , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  D. Jackson.  Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent Data , 1972 .

[7]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Precision of geodolite distance measurements for determining fault movements , 1973 .

[8]  J. C. Savage.  A possible bias in the California state geodimeter data , 1975 .

[9]  R. Parker.  Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[10]  M. Matsu'ura.  INVERSION OF GEODETIC DATA , 1977 .

[11]  A. Nur,et al.  Strike slip faulting in a downward varying crust , 1979 .

[12]  W. Thatcher.  Systematic inversion of geodetic data in central California , 1979 .

[13]  W. Welsch.  A REVIEW OF THE ADJUSTMENT OF FREE NETWORKS , 1979 .

[14]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodolite measurements of deformation near Hollister, California, 1971–1978 , 1979 .

[15]  D. Jackson.  The use of a priori data to resolve non‐uniqueness in linear inversion , 1979 .

[16]  P. Harsh,et al.  Slip on the San Andreas fault in central California from alinement array surveys , 1980 .

[17]  Paul Segall,et al.  Mechanics of discontinuous faults , 1980 .

[18]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Strain accumulation in southern California, 1973–1980 , 1981 .

[19]  D. Boore,et al.  Control of rupture by fault geometry during the 1966 parkfield earthquake , 1981 .

[20]  W. Prescott.  The determination of displacement fields from geodetic data along a strike slip fault , 1981 .

[21]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[22]  California John O. Langbein.  An Interpretation of Episodic Slip on the Calaveras Fault , 1981 .

[23]  W. D. Stuart,et al.  Long‐term fault creep observations in central California , 1982 .

[24]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Deformation near the junction of the creeping and locked segments of the San Andreas fault, Cholame Valley, California (1970-1980) , 1983 .

[25]  Thomas V. McEvilly,et al.  Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes , 1984 .

[26]  J. Crouch,et al.  Post-Miocene Compressional Tectonics Along the Central California Margin , 1984 .

[27]  W. Menke.  Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[28]  T. Jordan,et al.  Vector Constraints on Quaternary Deformation of the Western United States East and West of the San Andreas Fault , 1984 .

[29]  W. D. Stuart,et al.  Forecast model for moderate earthquakes near Parkfield, California , 1985 .

[30]  W. H. Bakun,et al.  The Parkfield, California, Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 1985, Science.

[31]  P. Segall,et al.  Slip Deficit on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, as Revealed by Inversion of Geodetic Data , 1986, Science.

[32]  Steven N. Ward,et al.  An inversion for slip distribution and fault shape from geodetic observations of the 1983, Borah Peak, Idaho, Earthquake , 1986 .

[33]  W. Bakun,et al.  Temporal changes in microseismicity and creep near Parkfield, California , 1987, Nature.

[34]  W. Prescott,et al.  Geodetic measurements near Parkfield, California, 1959–1984 , 1987 .