Comparison of Area-Based and Individual Tree-Based Methods for Predicting Plot-Level Forest Attributes

Approaches to deriving forest information from laser scanner data have generally made use of two methods: the area-based and individual tree-based approaches. In this paper, these two methods were evaluated and compared for their abilities to predict forest attributes at the plot level using the same datasets. Airborne laser scanner data were collected over the Evo forest area, southern Finland, with an averaging point density of 2.6 points/m2. Mean height, mean diameter and volume were predicted from laser-derived features for plots (area-based method) or tree height, diameter at breast height and volume for individual trees (individual tree-based method) using random forests technique. To evaluate and compare the two forest inventory methods, the root-mean-squared error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) between the predicted and observed plot-level values were computed. The results indicated that both area-based method (with an RMSE of 6.42% for mean height, 10.32% for mean diameter and 20.90% for volume) and individual tree-based method (with an RMSE of 5.69% for mean height, 10.77% for mean diameter and 18.55% for volume) produced promising and compatible results. Increase in point density is expected to increase the accuracy of the individual tree-based technique more than that of the area-based technique.

[1]  Jörgen Wallerman,et al.  Estimating field-plot data of forest stands using airborne laser scanning and SPOT HRG data , 2007 .

[2]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Comparing thr accuracy of laser scanner with other optical remote sensing data sources for stand attributes retrieval , 2000 .

[3]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[4]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  A LiDAR-derived canopy density model for tree stem and crown mapping in Australian forests , 2007 .

[5]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Calibration of laser-derived tree height estimates by means of photogrammetric techniques , 2004 .

[6]  S. Popescu,et al.  Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass , 2003 .

[7]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic detection of harvested trees and determination of forest growth using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[8]  Tomas Brandtberg.  Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[9]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[10]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[11]  E. Næsset.  Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[12]  J. Holmgren.  Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[13]  Metsäntutkimuslaitos.  Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae , 1982 .

[14]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  DETECTING AND ESTIMATING ATTRIBUTES FOR SINGLE TREES USING LASER SCANNER , 2006 .

[15]  K. Itten,et al.  LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management , 2004 .

[16]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[17]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .

[18]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[19]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[20]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[21]  Jussi Peuhkurinen,et al.  Predicting Tree Attributes and Quality Characteristics of Scots Pine Using Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2009 .

[22]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[23]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[24]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating forest biomass using small footprint LiDAR data: An individual tree-based approach that incorporates training data , 2005 .

[25]  D. A. Hill,et al.  Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis , 2003 .

[26]  E. Næsset.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[27]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2003, Forest Science.

[28]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Performance of airborne laser scanning- and aerial photograph-based statistical and textural features in forest variable estimation , 2008 .

[29]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[30]  K. Lim,et al.  Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators , 2004 .

[31]  Jouko Laasasenaho.  Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch [Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Betula pubescens] , 1982 .

[32]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Growing stock estimation for alpine forests in Austria: a robust lidar-based approach , 2009 .

[33]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[34]  W. Krabill,et al.  Gross-merchantable timber volume estimation using an airborne lidar system , 1986 .

[35]  P. Axelsson.  DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[36]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Change Detection Techniques for Canopy Height Growth Measurements Using Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 2006 .