Comparison of the effects of stimulating extensor group I afferents on cycle period during walking in conscious and decerebrate cats

Abstract Previous studies have reported that stimulation of group I afferents from extensor muscles prolongs stance duration during walking in decerebrate cats. The main objective of this investigation was to determine whether this phenomenon occurs during walking in conscious cats. In conscious cats without lesions of the central nervous system (CNS), stimulation of group I afferents in the lateral gastrocnemius/soleus (LGS) nerve during stance prolonged extensor burst duration and increased the cycle period in five of seven animals. The mean increases in cycle period were modest, ranging from 6 to 22%. In five of six animals that walked both quadrupedally and bipedally at the same rate, the effects on cycle period were stronger during bipedal stepping (18% mean increase in cycle period compared with 9%). The stimulated nerves were transected and the experimental procedure was usually delayed in the conscious animals for 2–3 days following implantation of the stimulating electrodes. To assess whether chronic axotomy of the LGS nerve was a factor in the decreased effectiveness, four of the cats with chronic nerve section were decerebrated and their LGS nerves were stimulated after the animals began to spontaneously walk on a motorized treadmill. In all four of these animals, the effects of stimulating the chronically cut LGS nerve on the step cycle period became stronger following decerebration. However, these effects were not as strong as those produced when an acutely sectioned LGS nerve was stimulated. During both quadrupedal and bipedal walking, stimulation of the LGS nerve increased the amplitude of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) electromyogram. The augmented activity of the MG muscle contributed to an increased extension of the ankle during stimulated steps. The conclusion from these experiments is that stimulation of the group I afferents in extensor nerves can prolong stance in the conscious cat, but this effect is weaker than in decerebrate animals. It is likely that transmission in the polysynaptic group I pathways controlling stance duration is regulated in a complex fashion by descending signals from the brain in the conscious animal.

[1]  S. Grillner Neurobiological bases of rhythmic motor acts in vertebrates. , 1985, Science.

[2]  K. Pearson,et al.  Plasticity of the extensor group I pathway controlling the stance to swing transition in the cat. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat , 1987, Brain Research.

[4]  M. L. Shik,et al.  [Control of walking and running by means of electric stimulation of the midbrain]. , 1966, Biofizika.

[5]  P. Matthews The human stretch reflex and the motor cortex , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  Adaptive plasticity in spinal cord. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[7]  S. Grillner,et al.  The locomotion of the low spinal cat. I. Coordination within a hindlimb. , 1980, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  [Interaction of symmetric extremities during controlled locomotion]. , 1970, Biofizika.

[9]  Shik Ml,et al.  Control of walking and running by means of electrical stimulation of the mesencephalon. , 1969 .

[10]  K. Pearson Proprioceptive regulation of locomotion , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  D. McCrea,et al.  Ankle extensor group I afferents excite extensors throughout the hindlimb during fictive locomotion in the cat. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  H. Forssberg Stumbling corrective reaction: a phase-dependent compensatory reaction during locomotion. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Shik Ml,et al.  Interaction of symmetric extremities during controlled locomotion , 1970 .

[14]  S. Rossignol,et al.  The locomotion of the low spinal cat. II. Interlimb coordination. , 1980, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  D A McCrea,et al.  Effects of stimulation of hindlimb flexor group II afferents during fictive locomotion in the cat. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  P. Whelan CONTROL OF LOCOMOTION IN THE DECEREBRATE CAT , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[17]  K. Pearson,et al.  Reversal of the influence of group Ib afferents from plantaris on activity in medial gastrocnemius muscle during locomotor activity. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Function of group 1 extensor feedback in the control of locomotion , 1996 .

[19]  M. Udo,et al.  A new learning paradigm: adaptive changes in interlimb coordination during perturbed locomotion in decerebrate cats , 1993, Neuroscience Research.

[20]  A. Prochazka Sensorimotor gain control: A basic strategy of motor systems? , 1989, Progress in Neurobiology.

[21]  S. Grillner,et al.  The effect of dorsal root transection on the efferent motor pattern in the cat's hindlimb during locomotion. , 1984, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[22]  C. Marsden,et al.  Human postural responses. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Segmental reflex action in normal and decerebrate cats. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  K. Pearson,et al.  Contribution of hind limb flexor muscle afferents to the timing of phase transitions in the cat step cycle. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  T. Drew Visuomotor coordination in locomotion , 1991, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  K. Pearson Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.