Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for the Binding of TMC114, a Next-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor

ABSTRACT TMC114, a newly designed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor, is extremely potent against both wild-type (wt) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) viruses in vitro as well as in vivo. Although chemically similar to amprenavir (APV), the potency of TMC114 is substantially greater. To examine the basis for this potency, we solved crystal structures of TMC114 complexed with wt HIV-1 protease and TMC114 and APV complexed with an MDR (L63P, V82T, and I84V) protease variant. In addition, we determined the corresponding binding thermodynamics by isothermal titration calorimetry. TMC114 binds approximately 2 orders of magnitude more tightly to the wt enzyme (Kd = 4.5 × 10−12 M) than APV (Kd = 3.9 × 10−10 M). Our X-ray data (resolution ranging from 2.2 to 1.2 Å) reveal strong interactions between the bis-tetrahydrofuranyl urethane moiety of TMC114 and main-chain atoms of D29 and D30. These interactions appear largely responsible for TMC114's very favorable binding enthalpy to the wt protease (−12.1 kcal/mol). However, TMC114 binding to the MDR HIV-1 protease is reduced by a factor of 13.3, whereas the APV binding constant is reduced only by a factor of 5.1. However, even with the reduction in binding affinity to the MDR HIV protease, TMC114 still binds with an affinity that is more than 1.5 orders of magnitude tighter than the first-generation inhibitors. Both APV and TMC114 fit predominantly within the substrate envelope, a property that may be associated with decreased susceptibility to drug-resistant mutations relative to that of first-generation inhibitors. Overall, TMC114's potency against MDR viruses is likely a combination of its extremely high affinity and close fit within the substrate envelope.

[1]  J. Condra,et al.  In vivo emergence of HIV-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitors , 1995, Nature.

[2]  A. Velázquez‐Campoy,et al.  The binding energetics of first- and second-generation HIV-1 protease inhibitors: implications for drug design. , 2001, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[3]  Celia A Schiffer,et al.  Discovery and selection of TMC114, a next generation HIV-1 protease inhibitor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  The MIDAS display system , 1988 .

[5]  Volker Brendel,et al.  Identification of Biased Amino Acid Substitution Patterns in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates from Patients Treated with Protease Inhibitors , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[6]  A. Velázquez‐Campoy,et al.  Thermodynamic basis of resistance to HIV-1 protease inhibition: calorimetric analysis of the V82F/I84V active site resistant mutant. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[7]  B. G. Rao,et al.  In vitro selection and characterization of VX-478 resistant HIV-1 variants. , 1998, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[8]  Richard J Morris,et al.  ARP/wARP's model-building algorithms. I. The main chain. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[9]  J. Coffin,et al.  HIV population dynamics in vivo: implications for genetic variation, pathogenesis, and therapy , 1995, Science.

[10]  H. B. Schock,et al.  An alternate binding site for the P1-P3 group of a class of potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors as a result of concerted structural change in the 80s loop of the protease. , 2000, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[11]  Michael S. Chapman,et al.  Restrained real-space macromolecular atomic refinement using a new resolution-dependent electron-density function , 1995 .

[12]  K. Chou,et al.  Predicting human immunodeficiency virus protease cleavage sites in proteins by a discriminant function method , 1996, Proteins.

[13]  J. Navaza,et al.  AMoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement , 1994 .

[14]  D. Ho,et al.  Selection and analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants with increased resistance to ABT-538, a novel protease inhibitor , 1995, Journal of virology.

[15]  Philip R. Johnson,et al.  Antibodies to the putative SIV infection‐enhancing domain diminish beneficial effects of an SIV gp160 vaccine in rhesus macaques , 1995, AIDS.

[16]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[17]  M. D. De Pasquale,et al.  In Vitro Evolution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag-Protease Region and Maintenance of Reverse Transcriptase Resistance following Prolonged Drug Exposure , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[18]  H. B. Schock,et al.  Mutational Anatomy of an HIV-1 Protease Variant Conferring Cross-resistance to Protease Inhibitors in Clinical Trials , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Celia A Schiffer,et al.  Lack of synergy for inhibitors targeting a multi‐drug‐resistant HIV‐1 protease , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Substrate shape determines specificity of recognition for HIV-1 protease: analysis of crystal structures of six substrate complexes. , 2002, Structure.

[21]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Combating Susceptibility to Drug ResistanceLessons from HIV-1 Protease , 2004 .

[22]  Bryan Chan,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and protease sequence database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  B. Sigurskjold,et al.  Exact analysis of competition ligand binding by displacement isothermal titration calorimetry. , 2000, Analytical biochemistry.

[24]  John W. Erickson,et al.  Structural basis of drug resistance for the V82A mutant of HIV-1 proteinase , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[25]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[26]  P. Anderson,et al.  Structure-based design of HIV-1 protease inhibitors: replacement of two amides and a 10 pi-aromatic system by a fused bis-tetrahydrofuran. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[28]  R. Weiss Human Retroviruses, Cancer, and AIDS. Approaches to Prevention and Therapy , 1988 .

[29]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Viability of a Drug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Variant: Structural Insights for Better Antiviral Therapy , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[30]  J. Falloon,et al.  Drug resistance during indinavir therapy is caused by mutations in the protease gene and in its Gag substrate cleavage sites , 1997, Journal of virology.

[31]  S. Pettit,et al.  The regulation of sequential processing of HIV-1 Gag by the viral protease. , 1998, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[32]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[33]  C. Debouck,et al.  The HIV-1 protease as a therapeutic target for AIDS. , 1992, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[34]  P. Lam,et al.  Counteracting HIV-1 protease drug resistance: structural analysis of mutant proteases complexed with XV638 and SD146, cyclic urea amides with broad specificities. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[35]  D. Lamarre,et al.  Second locus involved in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to protease inhibitors , 1996, Journal of virology.

[36]  C. Schiffer,et al.  How does a symmetric dimer recognize an asymmetric substrate? A substrate complex of HIV-1 protease. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  N. Roberts Drug-resistance patterns of saquinavir and other HIV proteinase inhibitors. , 1995, AIDS.

[38]  A. Velázquez‐Campoy,et al.  Overcoming drug resistance in HIV‐1 chemotherapy: The binding thermodynamics of Amprenavir and TMC‐126 to wild‐type and drug‐resistant mutants of the HIV‐1 protease , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[39]  Celia A Schiffer,et al.  Combating susceptibility to drug resistance: lessons from HIV-1 protease. , 2004, Chemistry & biology.

[40]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  Structure-based inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.

[41]  K. Sharp,et al.  Protein folding and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons , 1991, Proteins.

[42]  M. Murcko,et al.  Crystal Structure of HIV-1 Protease in Complex with Vx-478, a Potent and Orally Bioavailable Inhibitor of the Enzyme , 1995 .

[43]  Charles E. Bugg,et al.  Crystallographic and Modeling Methods in Molecular Design , 1990, Springer New York.

[44]  M. Kjeldgaard,et al.  O: A Macromolecule Modeling Environment , 1990 .

[45]  Arun K. Ghosh,et al.  A Potent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor, UIC-94003 (TMC-126), and Selection of a Novel (A28S) Mutation in the Protease Active Site , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[46]  C. Craik,et al.  Regulation of autoproteolysis of the HIV-1 and HIV-2 proteases with engineered amino acid substitutions. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.