Low Power Wide Area Networks: A Survey

Low Power Wide Area (LPWA) networks are attracting a lot of attention primarily because of their ability to offer affordable connectivity to the low-power devices distributed over very large geographical areas. In realizing the vision of the Internet of Things (IoT), LPWA technologies complement and sometimes supersede the conventional cellular and short range wireless technologies in performance for various emerging smart city and machine-to-machine (M2M) applications. This survey paper presents the design goals and the techniques, which different LPWA technologies exploit to offer wide-area coverage to low-power devices at the expense of low data rates. We survey several emerging LPWA technologies and the standardization activities carried out by different standards development organizations (e.g., IEEE, IETF, 3GPP, ETSI) as well as the industrial consortia built around individual LPWA technologies (e.g., LORa Alliance,WEIGHTLESS-SIG, and DASH7 Alliance). We further note that LPWA technologies adopt similar approaches, thus sharing the same limitations and challenges. This paper expands on these research challenges and identifies potential directions to address them. While the proprietary LPWA technologies are already hitting the market with large nationwide roll-outs, this paper encourages an active engagement of the research community in solving problems that will shape the connectivity of tens of billions of devices in the next decade.

[1]  Andrea Zanellaza.  Best Practice in RSS Measurements and Ranging , 2016 .

[2]  Maria Rita Palattella,et al.  Internet of Things in the 5G Era: Enablers, Architecture, and Business Models , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Best Practice in RSS Measurements and Ranging , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Kuor-Hsin Chang,et al.  The IEEE 802.15.4g standard for smart metering utility networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[5]  Paul Thomas,et al.  Low Throughput Networks for the IoT: Lessons learned from industrial implementations , 2015, 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[6]  Jesus Alonso-Zarate,et al.  Goodbye, ALOHA! , 2016, IEEE Access.

[7]  A. Sheludko,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF THE BUSINESS MODEL , 2014 .

[8]  Stewart Bryant,et al.  Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) , 2015 .

[9]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless position location: fundamentals, implementation strategies, and sources of error , 1997, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion.

[10]  Niels Jacobsen,et al.  A communications system , 2003 .

[11]  Konstantin Mikhaylov,et al.  On the coverage of LPWANs: range evaluation and channel attenuation model for LoRa technology , 2015, 2015 14th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[12]  Lei Lei,et al.  A study of clear channel assessment performance for low power wide area networks , 2014 .

[13]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Analysis of IPv6 over LPWAN: design space and challenges , 2016 .

[14]  Laurent Toutain,et al.  Constrained Signaling Over LP-WAN , 2016 .

[15]  Glenn Ergeerts,et al.  DASH7 alliance protocol 1.0: Low-power, mid-range sensor and actuator communication , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN).

[16]  David K. Chiabi.  European Telecommunications Standards Institute , 2015 .

[17]  Xiong Xiong,et al.  Low power wide area machine-to-machine networks: key techniques and prototype , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  彼得·戴维·马萨姆,et al.  Narrow-band transceiver , 2007 .

[19]  Evangelos Theodoridis,et al.  SmartSantander: IoT experimentation over a smart city testbed , 2014, Comput. Networks.