Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images—comparison with subjective visual assessment
暂无分享,去创建一个
C P Lawinski | P Blake | A Pascoal | I Honey | I. Honey | C. Lawinski | A. Pascoal | P. Blake
[1] D S Evans,et al. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.
[2] L. Wagner,et al. Analysis of variations in contrast-detail experiments. , 1984, Medical physics.
[3] P F Judy,et al. Detection of noisy visual targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] C E Ravin,et al. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy. , 2001, Radiology.
[5] X Liu,et al. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study. , 2001, Medical physics.
[6] Alexander L C Kwan,et al. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs. , 2003, Medical physics.
[7] C J Martin,et al. Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.
[8] Xinming Liu,et al. A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement. , 2004, Medical physics.
[9] Markus Völk,et al. Evaluation of Lossy Data Compression of Chest X-Rays: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Study , 2003, Investigative radiology.