Geolocating the stranger: the mapping of uncertainty as a configuration of matching and warranting techniques in dating apps

ABSTRACT Geolocation as an increasingly common technique in dating apps is often portrayed as a way of configuring uncertainty that facilitates playful interaction with unknown strangers while avoiding subjecting the user to unwanted risks. Geolocation features are used in these apps on the one hand as matching techniques that created links between the user and potential partners through geographical location, and on the other as warranting techniques that can help a user to determine whether to trust a given profile. Tracing a trajectory from Georg Simmel’s figure of the stranger as intrinsic to modern urban culture, through Stanley Milgram’s familiar stranger as an inspiration for the infrastructure of social networking sites, to a consideration of the double perspective of overview and embedment inherent in geolocation’s ability to map, we identify the stalker as an emblematic figure that appears not as a threatening Other, but rather as our own doubling.

[1]  Emily Rosamond.  To sort, to match and to share: addressivity in online dating platforms , 2018 .

[2]  Michael Nebeling Petersen,et al.  Bleeding boundaries: Domesticating gay hook-up apps , 2018 .

[3]  Stina Teilmann-Lock,et al.  The transformative power of the thumbnail image: Media logistics and infrastructural aesthetics , 2017, First Monday.

[4]  O. Goriunova.  Global Digital Culture| The Lurker and the Politics of Knowledge in Data Culture , 2017 .

[5]  R. Walker,et al.  Stalking , 2017, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[6]  Xiao Ma,et al.  What Happens in Happn: The Warranting Powers of Location History in Online Dating , 2017, CSCW.

[7]  K. Albury,et al.  Safe on My Phone? Same-Sex Attracted Young People’s Negotiations of Intimacy, Visibility, and Risk on Digital Hook-Up Apps , 2016 .

[8]  Carolina Cambre,et al.  Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic , 2016 .

[9]  Michael Liegl,et al.  Intimacy Mobilized: Hook-Up Practices in the Location-Based Social Network Grindr , 2016 .

[10]  Jed R. Brubaker,et al.  Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr , 2016, New Media Soc..

[11]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app , 2015, New Media Soc..

[12]  Kane Race,et al.  Speculative pragmatism and intimate arrangements: online hook-up devices in gay life , 2015, Culture, health & sexuality.

[13]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Deception with Technology , 2015 .

[14]  Andry Rakotonirainy,et al.  TrainRoulette: promoting situated in-train social interaction between passengers , 2013, UbiComp.

[15]  Dominique Pierre Batiste.  '0 Feet Away': The Queer Cartography of French Gay Men's Geo-social Media Use , 2013 .

[16]  G. Simmel.  The Metropolis and Mental Life , 2012 .

[17]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Disclosure, ambiguity and risk reduction in real-time dating sites , 2012, GROUP.

[18]  Sameer Patil,et al.  "Check out where I am!": location-sharing motivations, preferences, and practices , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  N. Mirzoeff.  The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality , 2011 .

[20]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and 'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[21]  J. Craine,et al.  3.10. Affective Geovisualisations , 2011 .

[22]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability , 2011, New Media Soc..

[23]  J. Dittmer.  Emotional geographies , 2011 .

[24]  T. Dalrymple.  The man of the crowd , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  From awareness to repartee: sharing location within social groups , 2008, CHI.

[26]  D. Taylor.  The Sovereign Map: Theoretical Approaches in Cartography Throughout History , 2007, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[27]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  From Cyber to Hybrid , 2006 .

[28]  S. Graham.  Software-sorted geographies , 2005 .

[29]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friendster and publicly articulated social networking , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[30]  Fred L. Sawin,et al.  The Stranger , 2021, Janus Head.

[31]  Kristin Veel,et al.  The Irreducibility of Space: Labyrinths, Cities, Cyberspace , 2006 .

[32]  G. Davies,et al.  Stalking: knowns and unknowns. , 2003, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[33]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[34]  Susan J. Smith,et al.  Editorial: Emotional geographies , 2001 .

[35]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[36]  田村 秀行,et al.  Mixed reality : merging real and virtual worlds , 1999 .

[37]  A. R. Stone,et al.  The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age , 1995 .

[38]  S. Milgram.  The experience of living in cities. , 1970, Science.

[39]  M. Wood.  The Stranger: A Study in Social Relationships , 1969 .

[40]  William Blake,et al.  The complete poems , 1883 .