Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation

Mandler theorized that the level of congruity between a product and a more general product category schema may influence the nature of information processing and thus product evaluations. Products that are moderately incongruent with their associated category schemas are expected to stimulate processing that leads to a more favorable evaluation relative to products that are either congruent of extremely incongruent. Data from three experiments conducted in new product contexts are consistent with Mandler's hypothesis and serve as a basis for theorizing about the process. Copyright 1989 by the University of Chicago.

[1]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The Open and Closed Mind , 1961 .

[2]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. , 1962 .

[3]  Verling C. Troldahl,et al.  A Short-Form Dogmatism Scale for Use in Field Studies , 1965 .

[4]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[5]  Jacob Jacoby,et al.  Personality and Innovation Proneness , 1971 .

[6]  M. Zanna,et al.  Context effects in impression formation: Changes in connotative meaning. , 1974 .

[7]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Dogmatism and tolerance for ambiguity as determinants of differential reactions to cognitive inconsistency. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[9]  Richard F. Yalch,et al.  A test of the self-perception explanation of the effects of rewards on intrinsic interest , 1978 .

[10]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[11]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[12]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[13]  Thomas K. Srull,et al.  Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models , 1981 .

[14]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Human Associative Memory: A Brief Edition. , 1981 .

[15]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers , 1981 .

[16]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association , 1982 .

[17]  W. Wood Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. , 1982 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[19]  R. Wyer,et al.  The recall of information about persons and groups , 1982 .

[20]  J. Darley,et al.  A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. , 1983 .

[21]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitude Accessibility as a Function of Repeated Attitudinal Expression , 1984 .

[22]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Of cabbages and kings: Assessing the extendibility of natural object concept models to social things. , 1984 .

[23]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[24]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  The influence of price on product evaluation : an information processing perspective , 1986 .

[26]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Covariation Assessment by Consumers , 1986 .

[27]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[28]  M. Sujan,et al.  Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising , 1987 .

[29]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework , 1987 .

[30]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Applications and Extensions of Categorization Research in Consumer Behavior , 1988 .