A fast atlas pre-selection procedure for multi-atlas based brain segmentation

Multi-atlas based MR image segmentation has been recognized as a quantitative analysis approach for brain. For such purpose, atlas databases keep increasing to include various anatomical characteristics of human brain. Atlas pre-selection becomes a necessary step for efficient and accurate automated segmentation of human brain images. In this study, we proposed a method of atlas pre-selection for target image segmentation on the MriCloud platform, which is a state-of-the-art multi-atlas based segmentation tool. In the MRIcloud pipeline, segmentation of lateral ventricle (LV) label is generated as an additional input in the segmentation pipeline. Under this circumstance, similarity of the LV label between target image and atlases was adopted as the atlas ranking scheme. Dice overlap coefficient was calculated and taken as the quantitative measure for atlas ranking. Segmentation results based on the proposed method were compared with that based on atlas pre-selection by mutual information (MI) between images. The final segmentation results showed a comparable accuracy of the proposed method with that from MI based atlas pre-selection. However, the computation load for the atlas pre-selection was speeded up by about 20 times compared to MI based pre-selection. The proposed method provides a promising assistance for quantitative analysis of brain images.

[1]  R. Kikinis,et al.  An Automated Registration Algorithm for Measuring MRI Subcortical Brain Structures , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  L. R. Dice.  Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[4]  Valerie Duay,et al.  Atlas-Based Segmentation of the Brain for 3-Dimensional Treatment Planning in Children with Infratentorial Ependymoma , 2003, MICCAI.

[5]  James V. Miller,et al.  Atlas stratification , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Optimum template selection for atlas-based segmentation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Xiaoying Tang,et al.  Bayesian Parameter Estimation and Segmentation in the Multi-Atlas Random Orbit Model , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  A Collignon,et al.  Automated multimodality image registration using information theory , 1995 .

[9]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Computational Anatomy Gateway: Leveraging XSEDE Computational Resources for Shape Analysis , 2014, XSEDE '14.

[12]  Xiaoying Tang,et al.  Tools for multiple granularity analysis of brain MRI data for individualized image analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[13]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Discovering Modes of an Image Population through Mixture Modeling , 2008, MICCAI.

[14]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  S. Mori,et al.  White matter atlases based on diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[16]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Subcortical brain segmentation of two dimensional T1-weighted data sets with FMRIB's Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool (FIRST) , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[17]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  Colin Studholme,et al.  A Supervised Patch-Based Approach for Human Brain Labeling , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.