Fifth Joint Meeting of the American Urological Association and the Japanese Urological Association International Affiliate Society Meeting at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association

Preface:  We are heartily grateful for the warm support of all of the people concerned, including the moderators and panelists of both societies for giving us the opportunity to hold the 5th American Urological Association/Japanese Urological Association (AUA/JUA) International Affiliate Society Meeting, held once again at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (29 May–3 June 2010, San Francisco, California, USA). The year of 2010 is a memorable one, being the start of reciprocal collaborations between the AUA and the JUA. The JUA, in collaboration with the AUA, is promoting an academic exchange program whereby outstanding and promising Japanese and American junior faculty members will be given the opportunity to work in the USA and Japan for 1 month. The program not only allows the sharing of knowledge and experience, but also is designed to foster a closer alliance between the AUA and JUA, and assists in identifying future leaders within both organizations. The AUA and JUA will have an exhibit booth at each other's annual meeting, promoting our new joint activities. Both the JUA and AUA will organize educational courses in Hawaii in 2011. With all of these activities, the JUA hopes it will provide greater opportunities for young Japanese urologists to participate in educational projects in the USA. We would like to thank Professor Anton J. Bueschen, President of AUA, Professor Robert C Flanigan, Secretary General of AUA and the staff of the AUA and JUA for supporting our program. At the same time, we need the support of all the members and their valuable suggestions. We look forward to further participation of AUA members to this meeting.

[1]  Markus Graefen,et al.  Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. , 2010, European urology.

[2]  Y. Tomita,et al.  Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the cytokine era: a cooperative group report of 1463 patients. , 2010, European urology.

[3]  P. Walsh,et al.  High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Horiguchi,et al.  Novel SN-38-incorporated polymeric micelle, NK012, strongly suppresses renal cancer progression. , 2008, Cancer research.

[6]  R. Dunn,et al.  Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy. , 2007, Urology.

[7]  R. Myers The anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy step by step , 2007 .

[8]  Naoko Kinukawa,et al.  STAT3 polymorphism predicts interferon-alfa response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  S. Herrell,et al.  Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[10]  S. Herrell,et al.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[11]  T. Sebo,et al.  Increased optical magnification from 2.5x to 4.3x with technical modification lowers the positive margin rate in open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.