Catching up in pharmaceuticals: a comparative study of India and Brazil

Since the mid-twentieth century, the national objective of India and Brazil has been to develop industrial capabilities in essential sectors such as pharmaceuticals. At the outset, they shared some common features: a considerable period of lax intellectual property rights regimes, large internal market and a reasonably strong cadre of scientists and engineers. However, over fifty years, India has had much more success in building indigenous capabilities in pharmaceuticals than Brazil, at least to date. Why? In exploring the answer to this question, we show that in both countries the design of State policy played a crucial role and the endogenous responses in the national system of innovation consisted of two parts. On the one hand, most of the time, the predicted and desired outcome was partially realized and on the other hand, there were invariably, other unpredicted responses that emerged. The latter unexpected elements, which were specific to the two countries, pushed them along distinctive trajectories.

[1]  B. Coriat The political economy of HIV/AIDS in developing countries : TRIPS, public health systems and free access , 2008 .

[2]  S. Ramani Who is interested in biotech? R&D strategies, knowledge base and market sales of Indian biopharmaceutical firms , 2002 .

[3]  Sachin Chaturvedi,et al.  Exploring Interlinkages between National and Sectoral Innovation Systems for Rapid Technological Catch-up: Case of Indian Biopharmaceutical Industry , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[4]  P. Tigre,et al.  Intellectual property rights anti-AIDS policy and generic drugs. Lessons from the Brazilian Public Health Program. , 2003 .

[5]  S. Ramani,et al.  Rising to the technological challenge: possibilities for integration of biotechnology in the Indian pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[6]  Basil Achilladelis,et al.  The dynamics of technological innovation : the case of the pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[7]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory , 2008 .

[8]  Economic Development From the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory , 2006 .

[9]  J. C. Cohen Public policies in the pharmaceutical sector : a case study of Brazil , 2000 .

[10]  F. Santiago Human resource management and learning for innovation : pharmaceuticals in Mexico , 2010 .

[11]  L. Soete International diffusion of technology, industrial development and technological leapfrogging , 1985 .

[12]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Pharmaceuticals Analyzed through the Lens of a Sectoral Innovation System , 2004 .

[13]  Shyama V. Ramani,et al.  Experimentation with Strategy and the Evolution of Dynamic Capability in the Indian Pharmaceutical Sector , 2009 .

[14]  H. Bruton A Reconsideration of Import Substitution , 1998 .

[15]  M. Abramovitz Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[16]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: towards a history‐friendly model , 2002 .

[17]  E. Urias,et al.  Institutional changes and their impacts on the Brazilian Pharmaceutical Industry: Is there an Innovation System on the way? , 2009 .

[18]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[19]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[20]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[21]  J. Sutz,et al.  LOOKING AT NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION FROM THE SOUTH , 2000 .

[22]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Measuring the Returns to R&D , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  F. Malerba Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[24]  Wilson Suzigan,et al.  Industrial policy and development , 2006 .

[25]  S. Athreye Economic Adversity and Entrepreneurship-led Growth , 2010 .

[26]  Steve Little,et al.  From Imitation to Innovation: The Evolution of R&D Capabilities and Learning Processes in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[27]  S. Guennif Droits de propriété intellectuelle et santé publique dans les pays du Sud , 2007 .

[28]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation and Catching-Up , 2006 .

[29]  Luciana Xavier de Lemos Capanema A indústria farmacêutica brasileira e a atuação do BNDES , 2006 .

[30]  J. Pradhan NEW POLICY REGIME AND SMALL PHARMACEUTICAL FIRMS , 2007 .

[31]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[32]  Cassandra M. Sweet Regulating the Tigers: The Institutional Dynamics of Indo-Brazilian Trade Reflections from the Pharmaceutical Sector , 2007 .

[33]  J. Pradhan New Policy Regime and Small Pharmaceutical Firms in India , 2007 .

[34]  A. Zon,et al.  Endogenous economic growth through connectivity , 2010 .

[35]  S. Lall The International Pharmaceutical Industry and Less-Developed Countries , 1980 .

[36]  Maurice Cassier,et al.  Scaling Up and Reverse Engineering: Acquisition of Industrial Knowledge by Copying Drugs in Brazil , 2008 .

[37]  Andrew Nassif NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM AND MACROECONOMIC POLICIES: BRAZIL AND INDIA IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .