Meteoroid and Orbital Debris Threats to NASA's Docking Seals: Initial Assessment and Methodology

The Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) will be exposed to the Micrometeoroid Orbital Debris (MMOD) environment in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) during missions to the International Space Station (ISS) and to the micrometeoroid environment during lunar missions. The CEV will be equipped with a docking system which enables it to connect to ISS and the lunar module known as Altair; this docking system includes a hatch that opens so crew and supplies can pass between the spacecrafts. This docking system is known as the Low Impact Docking System (LIDS) and uses a silicone rubber seal to seal in cabin air. The rubber seal on LIDS presses against a metal flange on ISS (or Altair). All of these mating surfaces are exposed to the space environment prior to docking. The effects of atomic oxygen, ultraviolet and ionizing radiation, and MMOD have been estimated using ground based facilities. This work presents an initial methodology to predict meteoroid and orbital debris threats to candidate docking seals being considered for LIDS. The methodology integrates the results of ground based hypervelocity impacts on silicone rubber seals and aluminum sheets, risk assessments of the MMOD environment for a variety of mission scenarios, and candidate failure criteria. The experimental effort that addressed the effects of projectile incidence angle, speed, mass, and density, relations between projectile size and resulting crater size, and relations between crater size and the leak rate of candidate seals has culminated in a definition of the seal/flange failure criteria. The risk assessment performed with the BUMPER code used the failure criteria to determine the probability of failure of the seal/flange system and compared the risk to the allotted risk dictated by NASA s program requirements.

[1]  D. Hastings,et al.  Spacecraft–Environment Interactions: Index , 1996 .

[2]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  Adhesion of Silicone Elastomer Seals for NASA's Crew Exploration Vehicle , 2008 .

[3]  M. Lambert,et al.  Hypervelocity impacts and damage laws , 1997 .

[4]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  Apollo Seals: A Basis for the Crew Exploration Vehicle Seals , 2006 .

[5]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  Characteristics of Elastomer Seals Exposed to Space Environments , 2007 .

[6]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  Effects of Hypervelocity Impacts on Silicone Elastomer Seals and Mating Aluminum Surfaces , 2009 .

[7]  Alan J. Watts,et al.  Dimensional scaling for impact cratering and perforation , 1995 .

[8]  Tang Qingming,et al.  Experimental laws of cratering for hypervelocity impacts of spherical projectiles into thick target , 1994 .

[9]  Burton G. Cour-Palais,et al.  Hypervelocity impact in metals, glass and composites , 1987 .

[10]  Bruce M. Steinetz,et al.  Assessing MMOD Impacts on Seal Performance , 2007 .

[11]  P. Anz-meador,et al.  Orbital Debris Environment for Spacecraft Designed to Operate in Low Earth Orbit , 1989 .

[12]  B. P. Denardo Projectile size effects on hypervelocity impact craters in aluminum , 1967 .

[13]  James S. Wilbeck,et al.  Review of hypervelocity penetration theories , 1987 .

[14]  S Evans,et al.  Bounding the risk of crew loss following orbital debris penetration of the International Space Station at assembly stages 1J and 1E. , 2004, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[15]  Bruce A. Banks,et al.  Environmental durability issues for solar power systems in low earth orbit , 1994 .

[16]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Meteoroid/Debris Shielding , 2003 .