Goodbye, Listwise Deletion: Presenting Hot Deck Imputation as an Easy and Effective Tool for Handling Missing Data

Missing data are a ubiquitous problem in quantitative communication research, yet the missing data handling practices found in most published work in communication leave much room for improvement. In this article, problems with current practices are discussed and suggestions for improvement are offered. Finally, hot deck imputation is suggested as a practical solution to many missing data problems. A computational tool for SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) is presented that will enable communication researchers to easily implement hot deck imputation in their own analyses.

[1]  P. Roth.  MISSING DATA: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW FOR APPLIED PSYCHOLOGISTS , 1994 .

[2]  J. Schafer.  Multiple imputation: a primer , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  The Treatment of Missing Data in Multivariate Analysis , 1977 .

[4]  Preston King,et al.  Worlds of Difference: European Discourses of Toleration, c. 1100–1550. By Cary J. Nederman. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000. 157p. $40.00 cloth, $18.95 paper. , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[5]  Graeme Hawthorne,et al.  Imputing cross-sectional missing data: comparison of common techniques. , 2005, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[6]  Alexander Basilevsky,et al.  Chapter 12 – Missing Data: A Review of the Literature , 1983 .

[7]  G. Kalton,et al.  Handling missing data in survey research , 1996, Statistical methods in medical research.

[8]  Roderick J A Little,et al.  A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response , 2010, International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique.

[9]  John L.P. Thompson,et al.  Missing data , 2004, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron disorders : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology, Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[10]  Paul E. Green,et al.  AN ALTERNATING LEAST‐SQUARES PROCEDURE FOR ESTIMATING MISSING PREFERENCE DATA IN PRODUCT‐CONCEPT TESTING* , 1986 .

[11]  Ofer Harel,et al.  Approaches to the Handling of Missing Data in Communication Research , 2008 .

[12]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  The Analysis of Social Science Data with Missing Values , 1989 .

[13]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  A gentle tutorial of the em algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models , 1998 .

[14]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  A Primer on Maximum Likelihood Algorithms Available for Use With Missing Data , 2001 .

[15]  P. Roth,et al.  Missing Data in Multiple Item Scales: A Monte Carlo Analysis of Missing Data Techniques , 1999 .

[16]  Thomas R Belin,et al.  Multiple imputation using an iterative hot‐deck with distance‐based donor selection , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  G. King,et al.  Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[18]  G. King,et al.  Listwise Deletion is Evil: What to Do About Missing Data in Political Science , 1998 .

[19]  J. Schafer,et al.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[20]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Missing Data in Educational Research: A Review of Reporting Practices and Suggestions for Improvement , 2004 .