Numerical Study on Characteristics and Control of Heading Angle of Floating LNG Bunkering Terminal for Improvement of Loading and Off-loading Performance

In this study, heading characteristics and heading control performances were evaluated to achieve the wave shield effect. The wave shield effect originating from heading control reduces the relative motions of moored vessels in a floating liquefied natural gas bunkering terminal (FLBT). Therefore, loading and off-loading performances are improved through reduced relative motion. For the objective of this study and efficiency of the analysis, a simplified model was used that assuming no relative motion of the moored vessels in the FLBT. The simplified model involved modeling the environmental loads and inertia of several floating bodies, including FLBT, into the environmental loads and inertia of a single vessel. The simplified model was validated through comparisons with model tests. With the simplified model, heading characteristics and heading control simulations were performed using low-frequency planar motion equations. The heading characteristics and heading control performances of FLBT were analyzed through the results of simulations under the expected environmental conditions. The capacity of the tunnel thrust for the heading control performance was confirmed to be adequate for improvement of the loading and off-loading performances using the wave shielding effects under the operation conditions. Received 5 February 2020, revised 5 March 2020, accepted 9 April 2020 Corresponding author Seunghoon Oh: +82-51-604-7825, carot541@kriso.re.kr It is noted that this paper is revised edition based on proceedings of the annual fall meeting the KSOE 2019 in Gimhae. c 2020, The Korean Society of Ocean Engineers This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution non-commercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 78 Seunghoon Oh et al. as the loading and off-loading operations are generally performed in the environment where one or more floating bodies are moored in the FLBT, evaluation of the heading angle characteristics and control performance of the FLBT with multiple floating bodies is required. In this study, heading angle control was numerically analyzed to evaluate the heading angle characteristics and control performance of the FLBT with multiple moored vessels. Environmental loads on the off-loading vessels, including the FLBT, were calculated through verified model tests and numerical analysis. As the mooring line of the vessel moored at the FLBT is taut, the amplitude of relative motion is small in terms of heading angle control. The relative motion of a vessel moored using the taut mooring can be ignored. Therefore, the heading angle characteristics and control performance were analyzed using a simplified model, in which the vessels moored at the FLBT were considered as a part of the FLBT. The environmental loads (wind, current, and wave) and inertia (mass, moment of inertia, and added mass) acting on the multiple vessels were replaced by the loads and inertia of a single vessel to construct a simplified model. Model tests and comparative studies were conducted to confirm the validity of the simplified model. Low-frequency planar motion simulation of the FLBT was performed using the simplified model that was validated under the environmental conditions of the expected FLBT installation position, and the heading angle characteristics of the FLBT were identified. Finally, the heading angle control performance, which is essential for the ocean wave shielding effect to improve the loading and off-loading performances, was evaluated. Proportional-derivative (PD) control was used for the heading angle control, and the Lagrange multiplier method was used as the thrust allocation algorithm. Through the performance evaluation of the heading angle control, the range of the controllable heading angles was verified, and the result can be used as a guide for the operating procedure. 2. Simplified Model for Loading and Off-loading Scenarios and Evaluation of Heading Angle Control Performance 2.1 Off-loading Scenario The FLBT receives LNG from LNG carriers and supplies the received LNG to the vessels with LNG propulsion systems through the LNG-BS. The FLBT developed in this study is shown in Fig. 1. It was designed to receive LNG from a 170K LNG carrier and unload the LNG to 30K and 5K LNG-BSs simultaneously. According to a study on the operating procedure of the developed FLBT, it can dock up to three vessels simultaneously, and the total operation time when three Fig. 1 Arrangement by the scenario of loading and off-loading operations Fig. 2 Maximum relative motion response in irregular wave conditions (Jung, 2019) Numerical Study on Characteristics and Control of Heading Angle of Floating LNG Bunkering Terminal 79 vessels are docked in the FLBT for off-loading was analyzed to be significantly short compared with the entire off-loading operation time. However, to determine the range of loading and off-loading, the operating conditions when the maximum number of vessels is docked should be considered. Kim et al. (2017), Kim et al. (2018), Jung et al. (2018), and Jung (2019) conducted model tests and numerical analysis of the relative motion of docked vessels in an FLBT during operation to examine the loading and off-loading performances of the FLBT. They confirmed that it is necessary to have the shielding effect from the sea waves and maintain the heading angle to improve the loading and off-loading performances of the 5K LNG-BS. The results of the study conducted by Jung (2019) confirmed that all the vessels docked in the FLBT with the heading angles ranging from 202.5° to 225° were capable of stable loading and off-loading as shown in Fig. 2. In this study, based on studies on the operating procedure of the FLBT and the loading and off-loading performances (Kim et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018; Jung et al., 2018; Jung, 2019), the heading angle characteristics and heading angle control performance will be evaluated to improve the loading and off-loading performances. 2.2 Environmental Conditions Based on the data survey on the environmental load, the wave deformation and seawater flow were numerically analyzed in the estimated installation area to evaluate the design conditions according to the frequency. As shown in Table 1, it was assumed the operating condition, under which docking, loading, and off-loading are performed, with a one-year return period. The environmental conditions were determined by selecting the expected installation area, as shown in Fig. 3, to evaluate the design conditions of the FLBT. Fig. 3 Proposed sites for FLBT operation Table 1 Operation conditions (1-year return period)

[1]  H. Helmholtz Über Integrale der hydrodynamischen Gleichungen, welche den Wirbelbewegungen entsprechen. , 1858 .

[2]  H. Helmholtz LXIII. On Integrals of the hydrodynamical equations, which express vortex-motion , 1858 .

[3]  M. J. M. Hill,et al.  On a Spherical Vortex , 1894 .

[4]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[5]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[6]  L. E. Fraenkel,et al.  On steady vortex rings of small cross-section in an ideal fluid , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  L. E. Fraenkel,et al.  Examples of steady vortex rings of small cross-section in an ideal fluid , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  J. Norbury,et al.  A family of steady vortex rings , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[10]  R. Bhattacharyya Dynamics of Marine Vehicles , 1978 .

[11]  F. Durst,et al.  Steady ellipsoidal vortex rings with finite cores , 1981 .

[12]  M. V. Dyke,et al.  An Album of Fluid Motion , 1982 .

[13]  J. Gollub,et al.  Vortex Flow in Nature and Technology , 1985 .

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[15]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Dynamics of a class of vortex rings , 1989 .

[16]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[17]  J. Spurk Boundary Layer Theory , 2019, Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Comparison study on advanced thruster control of underwater robots , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  Eddie N. Bernard,et al.  Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART): Brief Overview and Status Report , 1998 .

[21]  Subhash C. Jain,et al.  Open-Channel Flow , 2000 .

[22]  Gi Yong Hong,et al.  An Experimental Method for Analysis of the Dynamic Behavior of Buoys in Extreme Environment , 2001 .

[23]  Yoon-Rak Choi,et al.  An Analysis of Hydrodynamic Interaction of Floating Multi-Body Using Higher-Order Boundary Element Method , 2002 .

[24]  Dalsoo,et al.  A Study on the Water Circulation Enhancement inside Harbor Utilizing Wave Energy , 2002 .

[25]  Sang-Hoon Kim,et al.  A Study on Environmentally Friend Counter Facilities for Improvement of Harbor Water Quality , 2003 .

[26]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse Bayesian learning for basis selection , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[27]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Mo Samimy,et al.  A Gallery of Fluid Motion , 2004 .

[29]  Ulf Wickström,et al.  Comments on calculation of temperature in fire-exposed bare steel structures in prEN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—Part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design , 2005 .

[30]  Paul S. Krueger,et al.  Thrust Augmentation and Vortex Ring Evolution in a Fully-Pulsed Jet , 2005 .

[31]  F. Retief,et al.  Title of Report: , 2007 .

[32]  Paul C Hines,et al.  Perception-based automatic classification of impulsive-source active sonar echoes. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Nam-Seeg Hong,et al.  Three-Dimensional Numerical Model for Flow with Silt Protector , 2008 .

[34]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  A contour dynamics algorithm for axisymmetric flow , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[36]  Dominic E. Reeve,et al.  Numerical study of combined overflow and wave overtopping over a smooth impermeable seawall , 2008 .

[37]  Steven A. Hughes,et al.  Laboratory study of combined wave overtopping and storm surge overflow of a levee , 2009 .

[38]  Keith A. Willoughby Title of article: , 2010 .

[39]  N. Hong Investigation of Reducing Characteristics for the Spreading of Dredging Soil and the Diffusion of Contaminant by Silt Protector Curtain through Three Dimensional Numerical Model Experiment , 2010 .

[40]  Kyu-Han Kim,et al.  Efficiency Tests of Seawater Exchange System for Enhancement of Seawater Quality , 2010 .

[41]  Nancy Allen,et al.  Performances of human listeners and an automatic aural classifier in discriminating between sonar target echoes and clutter. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Dictionary Learning , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[43]  Verna Aardema,et al.  Title of Book: , 2011 .

[44]  Lin Li,et al.  Full scale study of combined wave and surge overtopping of a levee with RCC strengthening system , 2012 .

[45]  Jon Espen Skogdalen,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas drilling, using Deepwater Horizon as case study , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  Nam-Seeg Hong Application of Rigid Lid Boundary Condition for Three Dimensional Flow Analysis beneath Floating Structure , 2012 .

[47]  Sa Young Hong,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Towing Stability of Barges in Calm Water , 2013 .

[48]  Arshad Ahmad,et al.  A risk-based method for determining passive fire protection adequacy , 2013 .

[49]  Tak-Kee Lee,et al.  A Study on Calculation of Local Ice Pressures for ARAON Based on Data Measured at Arctic Sea , 2013 .

[50]  Terry Hedges 'Extending the H&R wave overtopping model to vertical structures' , 2013 .

[51]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Explosion modeling and analysis of BP Deepwater Horizon accident , 2013 .

[52]  Hajime Mase,et al.  Wave Runup and Overtopping at Seawalls Built on Land and in Very Shallow Water , 2013 .

[53]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  A study on methods for fire load application with passive fire protection effects , 2013 .

[54]  Shigeo Takahashi,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF STORM SURGE DISASTER ON THE U.S. EAST COAST BY HURRICANE SANDY , 2013 .

[55]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  A parametric study on the use of passive fire protection in FPSO topside module , 2014 .

[56]  Paul C Hines,et al.  Examining the robustness of automated aural classification of active sonar echoes. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Henrik Schmidt,et al.  Classification of underwater targets from autonomous underwater vehicle sampled bistatic acoustic scattered fields. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module , 2015 .

[59]  Nam-Seeg Hong Effect of Consecutive Ship Docking and Undocking on Seawater Circulation in Harbor , 2016 .

[60]  Naomi W. Lazarus A County‐Level Risk Assessment of the Deep Water Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico , 2016 .

[61]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  Fire Risk Analysis Procedure Based on Temperature Approximation for Determination of Failed Area of Offshore Structure: Living Quarters on Semi-Drilling Rig , 2016 .

[62]  Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker,et al.  Multisnapshot Sparse Bayesian Learning for DOA , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[63]  Anup Das,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Comparison of Off-Grid Sparse Bayesian Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Algorithms , 2017, IEEE Access.

[64]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Sparse Bayesian learning with multiple dictionaries , 2017, 2017 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[65]  황 성철,et al.  Wind Tunnel Test of Wind Loads and Current Loads Acting on FLBT and LNG Bunkering Shuttles in Side-by-side Configuration and Comparison with Empirical Formula , 2017 .

[66]  DaeSung-Jeong,et al.  Stability Evaluation of a LL-24-type Lightweight Light-Buoy Adopting EPP , 2017 .

[67]  D. Jung,et al.  Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics and operational feasibility of floating LNG bunkering terminal moored side-by-side with LNG Carrier and two LNG bunkering shuttles , 2018 .

[68]  Sooyoul Kim,et al.  TRANSIENT WAVE RUNUP, OVERTOPPING AND OVERFLOW MODELLING FOR INUNDATION SIMULATION DUE TO STORM SURGE , 2018 .

[69]  Fei Yuan,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition Based on Supervised Feature-Separation Algorithm , 2018, Sensors.

[70]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Narrowband and Wideband Off-Grid Direction-of-Arrival Estimation via Sparse Bayesian Learning , 2018, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[71]  Béla Paláncz,et al.  Support Vector Machines (SVM) , 2018 .

[72]  Sun-Hong Kwon,et al.  Experimental Study on Floating LNG Bunkering Terminal for Assessment of Loading and Offloading Performance , 2018 .

[73]  D. Buscombe,et al.  Probabilistic Substrate Classification with Multispectral Acoustic Backscatter: A Comparison of Discriminative and Generative Models , 2018, Geosciences.

[74]  Keunhwa Lee,et al.  Acoustic Classification of Surface and Underwater Vessels in the Ocean Using Supervised Machine Learning , 2019, Sensors.

[75]  Sanghyun Park,et al.  Development of Robot Platform for Autonomous Underwater Intervention , 2019 .

[76]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition: A Combination of Multi-Dimensional Fusion Features and Modified Deep Neural Network , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[77]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Robust Ocean Acoustic Localization With Sparse Bayesian Learning , 2019, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[78]  N. Kraus,et al.  Sbeach, Numerical Model for Simulating Storm-Induced Beach Change: Report 1: Empirical Foundation and Model Development , 2019 .

[79]  Jae‐Myung Lee,et al.  Dynamic Response of Drill Floor to Fire Subsequent to Blowout , 2020 .

[80]  Philisa J. Weidlein-Crist,et al.  Year , 2020, Definitions.