What difference does it make? Impact of peer-reviewed scholarships on scientific production

[1]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success , 2014 .

[2]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation , 2013 .

[3]  I. Feller Peer review and expert panels as techniques for evaluating the quality of academic research , 2013 .

[4]  Julia Melkers,et al.  Bibliometrics as a Tool for Research Evaluation , 2013 .

[5]  S. Brody Impact factor: Imperfect but not yet replaceable , 2013, Scientometrics.

[6]  Erik Arnold,et al.  Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme , 2012 .

[7]  Rüdiger Mutz,et al.  The generalized propensity score methodology for estimating unbiased journal impact factors , 2012, Scientometrics.

[8]  Laurent Bach As fronteiras da avaliação: algumas considerações sobre o caso europeu , 2012 .

[9]  J. Rigby Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact? , 2012, Scientometrics.

[10]  E. Manganote,et al.  Revisiting country research profiles: learning about the scientific cultures , 2012, Scientometrics.

[11]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation , 2012 .

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers , 2012, Scientometrics.

[13]  L. Bach The frontiers of evaluation : some considerations on the European case * , 2012 .

[14]  T. Burgoine,et al.  ‘These kids can't write abstracts’: reflections on a postgraduate writing and publishing workshop , 2011 .

[15]  J. Rigby Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation , 2011 .

[16]  Fernando A. B. Colugnati,et al.  Multidimensional evaluation of a program for early-career researcher in Brazil - the Young Investigator in Emerging Centers program , 2011, 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy.

[17]  R. Neumann,et al.  From PhD to initial employment: the doctorate in a knowledge economy , 2011 .

[18]  Christine Halse,et al.  The impact of the doctorate , 2011 .

[19]  Brian A. Jacob,et al.  The Impact of NIH Postdoctoral Training Grants on Scientific Productivity. , 2011, Research policy.

[20]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467–481, 2011 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[21]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff , 2011, Scientometrics.

[22]  Jörg Neufeld,et al.  Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics , 2011 .

[23]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.

[24]  F. Moral,et al.  Informe sociológico sobre la encuesta del valor social de las becas de la Fundación Carolina , 2011 .

[25]  Hsing-fen Lee,et al.  Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering , 2010 .

[26]  Michael Roach,et al.  A Taste for Science? PhD Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-Selection into Research Careers in Industry , 2010 .

[27]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: could the latter ever be preferable? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[28]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Article in Press G Model Journal of Informetrics a Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications , 2022 .

[29]  Junalyn Navarra-Madsen,et al.  Role of Scholarships in Improving Success Rates of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Majors , 2010 .

[30]  M. Nahata,et al.  New indices in scholarship assessment. , 2009, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[31]  M. Ins,et al.  Different — not just by label: research-oriented academic careers in Germany , 2009 .

[32]  J. Delafuente,et al.  The silver tsunami is coming: will pharmacy be swept away with the tide? , 2009, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[33]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes , 2008 .

[34]  B. Kamler Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis , 2008 .

[35]  Rickard Danell,et al.  The top eight percent: development of approved and rejected applicants for a prestigious grant in Sweden , 2006 .

[36]  Greg Ridgeway,et al.  Assessing the Effect of Race Bias in Post-traffic Stop Outcomes Using Propensity Scores , 2006 .

[37]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises , 1996, Scientometrics.

[38]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .

[39]  Zameer Shah,et al.  Measuring science , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[41]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[42]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[43]  E. Garfield Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[44]  G. Ridgeway The State of Boosting ∗ , 1999 .

[45]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America , 1998 .

[46]  F. Netting,et al.  Authorship and Collaboration , 1997 .

[47]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[48]  K. Pavitt What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .

[49]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[50]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[51]  P. T. Mountjoy,et al.  Science in History , 1969, Nature.

[52]  M. E. Bustamante,et al.  A comment on this paper. , 1965 .

[53]  Vannevar Bush,et al.  Science, the endless frontier : A report to the President , 2011 .