On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions

The aim of this paper is to capture the similarities and differences between assertions and polar questions so as to be able to account for the systematic partial overlap that exists in reactions to these speech acts in English and beyond. We first discuss the discourse components we assume, and then define default assertions and default polar questions in a way that allows us to characterize two types of responses to these speech acts, confirming and reversing reactions. The common characteristics of assertions and polar questions are responsible for the fact that both allow these reactions; the differences between the two speech acts explain the different contextual effects confirming and reversing moves have depending on whether they react to an assertion or a polar question. We then examine the distribution of a set of ‘polarity’ particles in Romanian in terms of the notions defined in the rest of the paper, and end with a series of predictions concerning polarity particles across languages.

[1]  Maribel Romero,et al.  On Negative Yes/No Questions , 2004 .

[2]  C. L. Hamblin Mathematical models of dialogue1 , 2008 .

[3]  E. Pope Questions and answers in English , 1976 .

[4]  Maarika Traat,et al.  Information structure in discourse , 2006 .

[5]  J.A.G. Groenendijk Questions and answers: Semantics and logic , 2003 .

[6]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Massimo Poesio,et al.  Towards an Axiomatization of Dialogue Acts , 1998 .

[8]  Laurence R. Horn A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[9]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Inferring Acceptance and Rejection in Dialog by Default Rules of Inference , 1996, ArXiv.

[10]  G. Jonathan,et al.  Dynamics and the Semantics of Dialogue , 1996 .

[11]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Agreement and Disputes in Dialogue , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[12]  Manfred Krifka Quantifying into Question Acts , 2001 .

[13]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[14]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[15]  Irit,et al.  Commitments , Beliefs and Intentions in Dialogue , 2008 .

[16]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Resolving questions, I , 1995 .

[17]  E. Maier,et al.  Denials in discourse , 2003 .

[18]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  Questions and Answers: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives , 2007, J. Appl. Log..

[19]  Daniel Büring,et al.  On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[20]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Intonation and Discourse: Biased Questions , 2007 .

[21]  H. H. Clark Arenas of language use , 1993 .

[22]  Jim Manley,et al.  Question of commitment , 1993, Nature.

[23]  Christine A. Gunlogson True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English , 2003 .

[24]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[25]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Commitments, Beliefs and Intentions in Dialogue , 2008 .

[26]  L. Karttunen Syntax and Semantics of Questions , 1977 .

[27]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[28]  R. Rooij,et al.  On Polar Questions , 2003 .

[29]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  The interactive stance : meaning for conversation , 2012 .