A comparative study of information input devices for aging computer users

The fast aging of many western and eastern societies and their increasing reliance on information technology create a compelling need to reconsider older users' interactions with computers. Changes in perceptual and motor skill abilities that often accompany the aging process have important implications for the design of information input devices. This paper summarises the results of two comparative studies on information input with 90 subjects aged between 20 and 75 years. In the first study, three input devices – mouse, touch screen and eye-gaze control – were analysed concerning efficiency, effectiveness and subjective task difficulty with respect to the age group of the computer user. In the second study, an age-differentiated analysis of hybrid user interfaces for input confirmation was conducted combining eye-gaze control with additional input devices. Input confirmation was done with the space bar of a PC keyboard, speech input or a foot pedal. The results of the first study show that regardless of participants' age group, the best performance in terms of short execution time results from touch screen information input. This effect is even more pronounced for the elderly. Regarding the hybrid interfaces, the lowest mean execution time, error rate and task difficulty were found for the combination of eye-gaze control with the space bar. In conclusion, we recommend using direct input devices, particularly a touch screen, for the elderly. For user groups with severe motor impairments, we suggest eye-gaze information input.

[1]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of discrete consecutive gaze gestures for text entry , 2008, ETRA.

[2]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  An Introduction to Usability , 1998 .

[3]  N. Dounskaia,et al.  Origins of submovements in movements of elderly adults , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[5]  Anke Huckauf,et al.  Gazing with pEYE: new concepts in eye typing , 2007, APGV.

[6]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  P R Cohen,et al.  The role of voice input for human-machine communication. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[9]  J. Cooke,et al.  Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans , 1989, Neurobiology of Aging.

[10]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Eye Movement-Based Human-Computer Interaction Techniques: Toward Non-Command Interfaces , 2003 .

[11]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND OLDER ADULTS , 2007 .

[12]  L. Sachs Angewandte Statistik : Anwendung statistischer Methoden , 1984 .

[13]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  The impact of age on computer input device use:: Psychophysical and physiological measures , 1999 .

[15]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[16]  T M Khalil,et al.  Efficacy of physical restoration in the elderly. , 1994, Experimental aging research.

[17]  Colin Ware,et al.  An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input2 , 1987, CHI 1987.

[18]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  William J. Weiland,et al.  Eye-Voice-Controlled Interface , 1986 .

[20]  A. Welford Between bodily changes and performance: some possible reasons for slowing with age. , 1984, Experimental aging research.

[21]  J A Morse,et al.  Analysis of variance and covariance. , 1984, Orthopedic nursing.

[22]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  Is the Trackball a Better Input Device for the Older Computer User? , 2004, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[23]  B. Shneiderman Designing the User Interface (3rd Ed.) , 1998 .

[24]  Worthy N. Martin,et al.  Human-computer interaction using eye-gaze input , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[25]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Interaction Devices and Web Design for Novice Older Users , 2005 .

[26]  G. Brogmus Effects of Age and Sex on Speed and Accuracy of Hand Movements: And the Refinements they Suggest for Fitts' Law , 1991 .

[27]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Eye‐gaze input versus mouse: Cursor control as a function of age , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Looking my way through the menu: the impact of menu design and multimodal input on gaze-based menu selection , 2008, ETRA.

[29]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Age differences in the maintenance and restructuring of movement preparation. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Emil F. Pascarelli,et al.  Repetitive strain injury , 1994 .

[31]  Jeffrey Fernandez,et al.  Normative data on joint ranges of motion of 25- to 54-year-old males , 1993 .

[32]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Evaluation and Analysis of Eye Gaze Interaction , 2001 .

[33]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Cognitive Aging: A Primer , 1999 .

[34]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Handbook of human factors and the older adult , 1997 .

[35]  Weijia Zhou,et al.  Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society , 1996 .

[36]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[37]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[38]  I. MacKenzie,et al.  A note on the information-theoretic basis of Fitts' law. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.

[40]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Evaluation of eye gaze interaction , 2000, CHI.

[41]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Aging and the restructuring of precued movements. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[42]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Extending Effective Target Width in Fitts' Law to a Two-Dimensional Pointing Task , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  J. Sandfeld,et al.  Effect of computer mouse gain and visual demand on mouse clicking performance and muscle activation in a young and elderly group of experienced computer users. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[44]  MacKenzie Is A Note on the Information-Theoretic Basis for Fitts’ Law , 1989 .

[45]  Mark T. Bolas Designing the user in user interfaces , 2014, UIST.

[46]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing , 1999, CHI '99.

[47]  J W Grice,et al.  Effects of aging on planning and implementing arm movements. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[48]  A T Welford,et al.  Signal, Noise, Performance, and Age , 1981, Human factors.

[49]  Waneen W. Spirduso,et al.  Eleven – Motor Performance and Aging , 1990 .

[50]  D. Hawthorn,et al.  Possible implications of aging for interface designers , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[51]  C. Ware,et al.  An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input2 , 1987, CHI '87.

[52]  Brian W. Epps Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[53]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  How Should Fitts' Law be Applied to Human-Computer Interaction? , 1992, Interact. Comput..

[54]  K. Hinckley Input technologies and techniques , 2002 .

[55]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[56]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Empirical evaluation of performance models of pointing accuracy and speed with a PC mouse , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[57]  Tiffany S. Jastrzembski,et al.  Aging and Input Devices: Voice Recognition Performance is Slower Yet More Acceptable than a Lightpen , 2005 .

[58]  J. Pratt,et al.  Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[59]  Jacqueline Agnew,et al.  Purdue pegboard age and sex norms for people 40 years old and older , 1988 .

[60]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Aging and rapid aiming arm movement control. , 1998, Experimental aging research.

[61]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  An Age-Related Comparison of a Touchscreen and a Novel Input Device , 2002 .

[62]  C. Riviere,et al.  Effects of age and disability on tracking tasks with a computer mouse: accuracy and linearity. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[63]  E. R. Crossman The Information-Capacity of the Human Motor-System in Pursuit Tracking , 1960 .

[64]  Neff Walker,et al.  Mouse Accelerations and Performance of Older Computer Users , 1996 .

[65]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[66]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Integrality and separability of input devices , 1994, TCHI.

[67]  Hiroyuki Umemuro Lowering elderly Japanese users’ resistance towards computers by using touchscreen technology , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[68]  B. Laursen,et al.  Performance and muscle activity during computer mouse tasks in young and elderly adults , 2001, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[69]  Bengt Ahlström,et al.  Overcoming touchscreen user fatigue by workplace design , 1992, CHI '92.

[70]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.). , 2008 .

[71]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[72]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  Computer Technology and the Older Adult , 1997 .

[73]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[74]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  Study of Computer Input Devices and Older Users , 2009 .

[75]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Age-Related Differences in a Kinematic Analysis of Precued Movements , 1990, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[76]  Yves Guiard,et al.  Navigation as multiscale pointing: extending Fitts' model to very high precision tasks , 1999, CHI '99.

[77]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Design proposals to assist older adults in using a computer mouse , 2003 .

[78]  K. Preston White,et al.  Eye-gaze word processing , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[79]  Joseph T. Gwin,et al.  Motor control and aging: Links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[80]  Johannes Springer,et al.  Position controlled input device for handicapped: Experimental studies with a footmouse , 1996 .

[81]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging? , 1990, CHI '90.

[82]  P R Yarnold,et al.  Assessing Functional Status of Elderly Adults via Microcomputer , 1996, Perceptual and motor skills.

[83]  M Akamatsu,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Ergonomics a Comparison of Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Feedback in a Pointing Task Using a Mouse-type Device , 2022 .

[84]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[85]  Sangkil Moon,et al.  Analysis of Variance and Covariance , 2010 .