The magnitude of the springback depends mainly on the residual stresses in the work piece after the forming stage. An accurate prediction of residual stresses puts, in turn, high demands on the material modelling during the forming simulation. Among the various ingredients that make up the material model, the hardening law is one of the most important ones for an accurate stress distribution prediction. The hardening law should be able to consider some, or all, of the phenomena that occurs during bending and unbending of metal sheets, such as the Bauschinger effect, the transient behaviour, permanent softening and work-hardening stagnation. Five different hardening models and four different steel grades have been evaluated in the present investigation. The unknown material parameters were identified by inverse modelling of a three point bending test. The model’s ability the reproduce experimental force-displacement relationships were evaluated. A simple springback experiment was performed for confirmation.
[1]
Holger Aretz.
A non-quadratic plane stress yield function for orthotropic sheet metals
,
2005
.
[2]
Fabrice Morestin,et al.
On the necessity of taking into account the variation in the Young modulus with plastic strain in elastic-plastic software
,
1996
.
[3]
Dorel Banabic,et al.
An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets
,
2005
.
[4]
C. O. Frederick,et al.
A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect
,
2007
.
[5]
R. H. Wagoner,et al.
Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback
,
2002
.
[6]
Fusahito Yoshida,et al.
A Model of Large-Strain Cyclic Plasticity and its Application to Springback Simulation
,
2002
.
[7]
R. K. Boger.
Non-monotonic strain hardening and its constitutive representation
,
2006
.