Subjectivity grouping: learning from users' rating behavior

Considering opinions of other users (called advisors) has become increasingly important for each user in open and dynamic online environments. However, users might be subjectively different or strategically dishonest. Previous approaches on this problem generally suffer from the issue of limited (especially shared) historic experience when tracking each individual advisor's behavior. In this paper, instead, we model each advisor as part of groups by proposing a two-layered clustering approach. Specifically, in the first layer, the agent of each user clusters her advisors into different subjectivity groups and dishonest types, with respect to their rating behavior. In the second layer, each advisor is assigned to groups with respective membership degrees. Finally, each agent adopts an alignment approach to help its user align advisors' ratings to the ones of her own. Experimental results on both simulations and real data verify that our approach can better help users utilize ratings provided by advisors in opinion evaluation and recommender systems.

[1]  Pascal Poupart,et al.  Bayesian Reputation Modeling in E-Marketplaces Sensitive to Subjectivity, Deception and Change , 2006, AAAI.

[2]  Yvette I. Sheline,et al.  Depression Duration But Not Age Predicts Hippocampal Volume Loss in Medically Healthy Women with Recurrent Major Depression , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Martin Ester,et al.  A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks , 2010, RecSys '10.

[4]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks , 2005 .

[5]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Multi-layer cognitive filtering by behavioral modeling , 2011, AAMAS.

[6]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  SARC: subjectivity alignment for reputation computation , 2012, AAMAS.

[7]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  TRAVOS: Trust and Reputation in the Context of Inaccurate Information Sources , 2006, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[8]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  A simple but effective method to incorporate trusted neighbors in recommender systems , 2012, UMAP.

[9]  Jie Zhang,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR SHARING SEMANTIC WEB TRUST RATINGS , 2007, Comput. Intell..

[10]  Marie desJardins,et al.  PRep: a probabilistic reputation model for biased societies , 2012, AAMAS.

[11]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  Taste and Trust , 2011, IFIPTM.

[12]  Qinyuan Feng,et al.  Vulnerabilities and countermeasures in context-aware social rating services , 2012, TOIT.

[13]  Cornelia Caragea,et al.  I want what i need!: analyzing subjectivity of online forum threads , 2012, CIKM.

[14]  LIRONG XIA,et al.  How Aggregators Influence Human Rater Behavior? , 2013 .

[15]  T. Levine,et al.  Content in Context Improves Deception Detection Accuracy , 2010 .

[16]  Cornelia Caragea,et al.  Thread Specific Features are Helpful for Identifying Subjectivity Orientation of Online Forum Threads , 2012, COLING.

[17]  T. Levine,et al.  People Lie for a Reason: Three Experiments Documenting the Principle of Veracity , 2010 .

[18]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  An Efficient Approach to Clustering in Large Multimedia Databases with Noise , 1998, KDD.

[19]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Misleading Opinions Provided by Advisors: Dishonesty or Subjectivity , 2013, IJCAI.

[20]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An efficient and versatile approach to trust and reputation using hierarchical Bayesian modelling , 2012, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Srujana Merugu,et al.  A scalable collaborative filtering framework based on co-clustering , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05).

[22]  David P. Doane,et al.  Measuring Skewness: A Forgotten Statistic? , 2011 .

[23]  Ruslan Salakhutdinov,et al.  Probabilistic Matrix Factorization , 2007, NIPS.