Balancing Structural and Temporal Constraints in Multitasking Contexts

Recent research has shown that when people multitask, both the subtask structure and the temporal constraints of the component tasks strongly influence people’s task-switching behavior. In this paper, we propose an integrated theoretical account and associated computational model that aims to quantify how people balance structural and temporal constraints in everyday multitasking. We validate the theory using data from an empirical study in which drivers performed a visual-search task while navigating a driving environment. Through examination of illustrative protocols from the model and human drivers as well as the overall fit on the aggregate glance data, we explore the implications of the theory and model for time-critical multitasking domains.

[1]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  The Multitasking Mind , 2010, Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures.

[2]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving , 2009, CHI.

[3]  Richard Reviewer-Granger.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  John R. Anderson.  How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[5]  John D. Lee,et al.  Secondary task boundaries influence drivers' glance durations , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[6]  Tuomo Kujala,et al.  The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Niels Taatgen,et al.  What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action. , 2009, Psychological review.

[9]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  The effects of time constraints on user behavior for deferrable interruptions , 2011, CHI.

[11]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Modeling visual sampling on in-car displays: The challenge of predicting safety-critical lapses of control , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Cognitive task analysis , 2009 .

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  From recurrent choice to skill learning: a reinforcement-learning model. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Allen Newell,et al.  The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems , 1980, CACM.

[15]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture , 2006, Hum. Factors.