Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND The combination of cobimetinib with vemurafenib improves progression-free survival compared with placebo and vemurafenib in previously untreated patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant advanced melanoma, as previously reported in the coBRIM study. In this Article, we report updated efficacy results, including overall survival and safety after longer follow-up, and selected biomarker correlative studies. METHODS In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed BRAF(V600) mutation-positive unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive response system to receive cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period in each 28-day cycle) or placebo, in combination with oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily). Progression-free and overall survival were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively; all analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01689519, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants. FINDINGS Between Jan 8, 2013, and Jan 31, 2014, 495 eligible adult patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib group (n=247) or placebo plus vemurafenib group (n=248). At a median follow-up of 14·2 months (IQR 8·5-17·3), the updated investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 12·3 months (95% CI 9·5-13·4) for cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus 7·2 months (5·6-7·5) for placebo and vemurafenib (HR 0·58 [95% CI 0·46-0·72], p<0·0001). The final analysis for overall survival occurred when 255 (52%) patients had died (Aug 28, 2015). Median overall survival was 22·3 months (95% CI 20·3-not estimable) for cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus 17·4 months (95% CI 15·0-19·8) for placebo and vemurafenib (HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·55-0·90; p=0·005). The safety profile for cobimetinib and vemurafenib was tolerable and manageable, and no new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events occurring at a higher frequency in patients in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group compared with the vemurafenib group were γ-glutamyl transferase increase (36 [15%] in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group vs 25 [10%] in the placebo and vemurafenib group), blood creatine phosphokinase increase (30 [12%] vs one [<1%]), and alanine transaminase increase (28 [11%] vs 15 [6%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 92 patients (37%) in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 69 patients (28%) in the vemurafenib group. Pyrexia (six patients [2%]) and dehydration (five patients [2%]) were the most common serious adverse events reported in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group. A total of 259 patients have died: 117 (47%) in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 142 (58%) in the vemurafenib group. The primary cause of death was disease progression in most patients: 109 (93%) of 117 in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 133 (94%) of 142 in the vemurafenib group. INTERPRETATION These data confirm the clinical benefit of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib and support the use of the combination as a standard first-line approach to improve survival in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech.

[1]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Pharmacodynamic effects and mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Ribas,et al.  Combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma: a phase 1b study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Lactate dehydrogenase as a selection criterion for ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma , 2014, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[5]  A. Lazar,et al.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes with specific BRAF and NRAS mutations in patients with metastatic melanoma , 2013, Cancer.

[6]  A. Ribas,et al.  Extended follow-up results of phase Ib study (BRIM7) of vemurafenib (VEM) with cobimetinib (COBI) in BRAF-mutant melanoma. , 2015 .

[7]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  Sex steroid hormone receptors in human thymoma. , 2003, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Acquired resistance and clonal evolution in melanoma during BRAF inhibitor therapy. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[9]  J. Fridlyand,et al.  Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Ascierto Ipilimumab in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: a summary of recent studies. , 2013, Tumori.

[12]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[13]  J. Utikal,et al.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer , 2002, Nature.

[15]  Jeffrey E Gershenwald,et al.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  A. Ribas,et al.  1093PDVEMURAFENIB AND COBIMETINIB POTENTLY INHIBIT PS6 SIGNALING IN BRAFV600 MUTATION-POSITIVE LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC MELANOMA FROM BRIM7 STUDY. , 2014, Annals of Oncology.

[17]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[18]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Damien Kee,et al.  Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors mediated by a RAF kinase switch in melanoma can be overcome by cotargeting MEK and IGF-1R/PI3K. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[20]  J. Larkin,et al.  Prognostic score for patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[21]  Dirk Schadendorf,et al.  Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Utikal,et al.  Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[24]  Kate Owen,et al.  Registered Report: COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation , 2016, eLife.

[25]  A. Hauschild,et al.  1092PDAN UPDATE ON OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS) AND FOLLOW-ON THERAPIES IN BREAK-3, A PHASE III, RANDOMIZED TRIAL: DABRAFENIB (D) VS. DACARBAZINE (DTIC) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH BRAF V600E MUTATION-POSITIVE METASTATIC MELANOMA (MM). , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  Tom Misteli,et al.  RAF inhibitor resistance is mediated by dimerization of aberrantly spliced BRAF(V600E) , 2011, Nature.