Axiomatising Incomplete Preferences through Sets of Desirable Gambles

We establish the equivalence of two very general theories: the first is the decision-theoretic formalisation of incomplete preferences based on the mixture independence axiom; the second is the theory of coherent sets of desirable gambles (bounded variables) developed in the context of imprecise probability and extended here to vector-valued gambles. Such an equivalence allows us to analyse the theory of incomplete preferences from the point of view of desirability. Among other things, this leads us to uncover an unexpected and clarifying relation: that the notion of `state independence'---the traditional assumption that we can have separate models for beliefs (probabilities) and values (utilities)---coincides with that of `strong independence' in imprecise probability; this connection leads us also to propose much weaker, and arguably more realistic, notions of state independence. Then we simplify the treatment of complete beliefs and values by putting them on a more equal footing. We study the role of the Archimedean condition---which allows us to actually talk of expected utility---, identify some weaknesses and propose alternatives that solve these. More generally speaking, we show that desirability is a valuable alternative foundation to preferences for decision theory that streamlines and unifies a number of concepts while preserving great generality. In addition, the mentioned equivalence shows for the first time how to extend the theory of desirability to imprecise non-linear utility, thus enabling us to formulate one of the most powerful self-consistent theories of reasoning and decision-making available today.

[1]  York Hagmayer,et al.  Qualitative , 2020, Psychology through Critical Auto-Ethnography.

[2]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Conformity and independence with coherent lower previsions , 2016, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[3]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Conditioning, updating and lower probability zero , 2015, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Desirability and the birth of incomplete preferences , 2015, ArXiv.

[5]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Independent products in infinite spaces , 2015 .

[6]  Arthur Paul Pedersen.  Comparative Expectations , 2014, Stud Logica.

[7]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Probability and time , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Conglomerable natural extension , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[9]  Marciano M. Siniscalchi,et al.  Ambiguity in the Small and in the Large , 2012 .

[10]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Estimating State Sequences in Imprecise Hidden Markov Models , 2012, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[11]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Accept & reject statement-based uncertainty models , 2012, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[12]  Efe A. Ok,et al.  Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes , 2012 .

[13]  Fabio Gagliardi Cozman.  Sets of probability distributions, independence, and convexity , 2012, Synthese.

[14]  Inés Couso,et al.  Sets of desirable gambles: Conditioning, representation, and precise probabilities , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[15]  Fabio Gagliardi Cozman,et al.  Sequential decision making with partially ordered preferences , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Notes on desirability and conditional lower previsions , 2010, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[17]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Independent natural extension , 2010, Artif. Intell..

[18]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Objective and Subjective Rationality in a Multiple Prior Model , 2010 .

[19]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Exchangeability and sets of desirable gambles , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[20]  Enrique Miranda,et al.  A survey of the theory of coherent lower previsions , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[21]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  Learning Reliable Classifiers From Small or Incomplete Data Sets: The Naive Credal Classifier 2 , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Imprecise probability trees: Bridging two theories of imprecise probability , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[23]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Marginal extension in the theory of coherent lower previsions , 2007, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[24]  P. M. Williams,et al.  Notes on conditional previsions , 2007, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[25]  R. Nau.  The Shape of Incomplete Preferences , 2006, ISIPTA.

[26]  Serafín Moral,et al.  Epistemic irrelevance on sets of desirable gambles , 2005, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[27]  Fabio Maccheroni,et al.  Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[28]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Recursive multiple-priors , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[29]  T. Bewley.  Knightian decision theory. Part I , 2002 .

[30]  R. Scozzafava,et al.  Probabilistic Logic in a Coherent Setting , 2002 .

[31]  Thomas Lukasiewicz,et al.  Reasoning with imprecise probabilities , 2000, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[32]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  Rethinking the Foundations of Statistics: Subject Index , 1999 .

[33]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[34]  P. Walley.  Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[35]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Consistent Plans, Consequentialism, and Expected Utility , 1989 .

[36]  L. Dubins.  Finitely Additive Conditional Probabilities, Conglomerability and Disintegrations , 1975 .

[37]  Jacques H. Dreze,et al.  Market allocation under uncertainty , 1970 .

[38]  M. Stone,et al.  Studies in Subjective Probability , 1965 .

[39]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  A Definition of Subjective Probability , 1963 .

[40]  R. Aumann.  UTILITY THEORY WITHOUT THE COMPLETENESS AXIOM , 1962 .

[41]  Abner Shimony,et al.  Coherence and the axioms of confirmation , 1955, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[42]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[43]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[44]  L. Cioletti.  Lectures Notes on Convex Analysis , 2019 .

[45]  J. Schreiber.  Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[46]  Marco Zaffalon,et al.  On the problem of computing the conglomerable natural extension , 2015, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[47]  Gert de Cooman,et al.  Credal networks under epistemic irrelevance: The sets of desirable gambles approach , 2015, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[48]  Matthias C. M. Troffaes,et al.  Introduction to imprecise probabilities , 2014 .

[49]  Edi Karni,et al.  Subjective Expected Utility With Incomplete Preferences , 2013 .

[50]  Ordered Preferences.  A REPRESENTATION OF PARTIALLY ORDERED PREFERENCES , 2007 .

[51]  David Ríos Insua,et al.  A note on an open problem in the foundations of statistics , 2002 .

[52]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  Rethinking the Foundations of Statistics: Decisions Without Ordering , 1990 .

[53]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[54]  M. Machina.  Dynamic Consistency and Non-expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[55]  Cedric A. B. Smith,et al.  Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision , 1961 .

[56]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour , 1944 .

[57]  B. D. Finetti.  La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives , 1937 .

[58]  B. Finetti.  Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità , 1931 .