A hybrid force/displacement seismic design method for steel building frames

This paper proposes a performance-based seismic design methodology for steel building frames which combines the advantages of the well-known force-based and displacement-based seismic design methods in a hybrid force/displacement design scheme. The proposed method controls structural performance by first transforming user-specified values of the interstorey drift ratio (non-structural damage) and local ductility (structural damage) to a target roof displacement and then, calculating the appropriate strength reduction factor for limiting ductility demands associated with the target roof displacement. The main characteristics of the proposed method are: (1) treats both drift and ductility demands as input variables for the initiation of the design process; (2) does not use a substitute single degree of freedom system; (3) makes use of current seismic code approaches as much as possible (e.g., conventional elastic response spectrum analysis and design); (4) includes the influence of the number of stories; (5) recognises the influence of the type of the lateral load resisting system (moment resisting frame or concentrically braced frame); (6) recognises the influence of geometrical (setbacks) or mass irregularities. A realistic design example serves to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method over the currently used force-based design procedure.

[1]  Mark Aschheim,et al.  Seismic Design Based on the Yield Displacement , 2002 .

[2]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Direct Displacement-Based Design: Use of Inelastic vs. Elastic Design Spectra , 2001 .

[3]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Response Analysis of Multistory Regular Steel MRF Subjected to Pulselike Earthquake Ground Motions , 2010 .

[4]  E. Gaylord,et al.  Design of Steel Structures , 1972 .

[5]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Estimation of seismic inelastic deformation demands in plane steel MRF with vertical mass irregularities , 2008 .

[6]  Yoshihiro Kimura,et al.  Effect of Column Stiffness on Braced Frame Seismic Behavior , 2004 .

[7]  B. Riley,et al.  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , 2009 .

[8]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .

[9]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges , 2003 .

[10]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Direct displacement-based seismic design , 2005 .

[11]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  THE LIMITATIONS AND PERFORMANCES OF DIFFERENT DISPLACEMENT BASED DESIGN METHODS , 2003 .

[12]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Seismic response of plane steel MRF with setbacks: Estimation of inelastic deformation demands , 2008 .

[13]  Božidar Stojadinović,et al.  Energy-based Seismic Design of Structures using Yield Mechanism and Target Drift , 2002 .

[14]  Nikitas Bazeos Comparison of three seismic design methods for plane steel frames , 2009 .

[15]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Drift and Ductility Estimates in Regular Steel MRF Subjected to Ordinary Ground Motions: A Design-Oriented Approach , 2008 .

[16]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Behavior Factor for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Plane Steel Moment Resisting Frames , 2007 .

[17]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Estimation of seismic drift and ductility demands in planar regular X‐braced steel frames , 2007 .

[18]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  A displacement‐based seismic design procedure for RC buildings and comparison with EC8 , 2001 .