Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion

Cell adhesion, spreading and migration require the dynamic formation and dispersal of contacts with the extracellular matrix (ECM). In vivo, the number, availability and distribution of ECM binding sites dictate the shape of a cell and determine its mobility. To analyse the geometrical limits of ECM binding sites required for cell attachment and spreading, we used microcontact printing to produce regular patterns of ECM protein dots of defined size separated by nonadhesive regions. Cells cultured on these substrata adhere to and spread on ECM regions as small as 0.1 μm2, when spacing between dots is less than 5 μm. Spacing of 5-25 μm induces a cell to adapt its shape to the ECM pattern. The ability to spread and migrate on dots ≥1 μm2 ceases when the dot separation is ≥30 μm. The extent of cell spreading is directly correlated to the total substratum coverage with ECM-proteins, but irrespective of the geometrical pattern. An optimal spreading extent is reached at a surface coating above 15%. Knowledge of these geometrical limits is essential for an understanding of cell adhesion and migration, and for the design of artificial surfaces that optimally interact with cells in a living tissue.

[1]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[3]  M. Toner,et al.  Microengineering of cellular interactions. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[4]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  G M Whitesides,et al.  Using self-assembled monolayers to understand the interactions of man-made surfaces with proteins and cells. , 1996, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Self-assembled organic monolayers: model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces , 1991, Science.

[8]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Exploring the Neighborhood Adhesion-Coupled Cell Mechanosensors , 2002, Cell.

[9]  Amy Brock,et al.  Geometric determinants of directional cell motility revealed using microcontact printing. , 2003, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  B. Imhof,et al.  Actin dynamics in living mammalian cells. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[11]  D E Ingber,et al.  Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[12]  C. David,et al.  High-efficiency Bragg–Fresnel lenses with 100 nm outermost zone width , 1999 .

[13]  B. Gumbiner,et al.  Cell Adhesion: The Molecular Basis of Tissue Architecture and Morphogenesis , 1996, Cell.

[14]  A F von Recum,et al.  Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  P. F. Nealey,et al.  Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque , 1999, Cell and Tissue Research.

[16]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Integrin transmembrane signaling and cytoskeletal control. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[17]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion , 1992, Cell.

[18]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[19]  Conrad D. James,et al.  Patterned Protein Layers on Solid Substrates by Thin Stamp Microcontact Printing , 1998 .

[20]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[21]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force transduction by Triton cytoskeletons , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[23]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia , 1995, Cell.

[24]  Heinz Schmid,et al.  Microcontact-Printing Chemical Patterns with Flat Stamps , 2000 .

[25]  T. Pollard,et al.  Actin dynamics. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[26]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[27]  B. Geiger,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix--cytoskeleton crosstalk. , 2001, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology.

[28]  K. Yamada,et al.  Integrin function: molecular hierarchies of cytoskeletal and signaling molecules , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Co-regulation of cell adhesion by nanoscale RGD organization and mechanical stimulus. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[30]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[31]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[32]  G M Bokoch,et al.  Activation of Rac and Cdc42 by integrins mediates cell spreading. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  Philip LeDuc,et al.  Use of micropatterned adhesive surfaces for control of cell behavior. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[34]  J Engel,et al.  Shapes, domain organizations and flexibility of laminin and fibronectin, two multifunctional proteins of the extracellular matrix. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Mieko Matsuzawa,et al.  Chemically modifying glass surfaces to study substratum-guided neurite outgrowth in culture , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Micropatterned Surfaces for Control of Cell Shape, Position, and Function , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[37]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase suppresses Rho activity to promote focal adhesion turnover. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[38]  P C Letourneau,et al.  Neurite extension across regions of low cell-substratum adhesivity: implications for the guidepost hypothesis of axonal pathfinding. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[39]  C. David,et al.  Line width control using a defocused low voltage electron beam , 1999 .

[40]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Biosynthetic and functional properties of an Arg-Gly-Asp-directed receptor involved in human melanoma cell attachment to vitronectin, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[42]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[43]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Trimers of the fibronectin cell adhesion domain localize to actin filament bundles and undergo rearward translocation. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[44]  Christoph Ballestrem,et al.  Marching at the front and dragging behind , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[46]  D. Ingber.  Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[47]  F. Wezeman.  Morphological foundations of precartilage development in mesenchyme , 1998, Microscopy research and technique.

[48]  Beat Imhof,et al.  The inner lives of focal adhesions. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[49]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.