Human-Machine Interface for the Control of Multi-Function Systems Based on Electrocutaneous Menu: Application to Multi-Grasp Prosthetic Hands

Modern assistive devices are very sophisticated systems with multiple degrees of freedom. However, an effective and user-friendly control of these systems is still an open problem since conventional human-machine interfaces (HMI) cannot easily accommodate the system’s complexity. In HMIs, the user is responsible for generating unique patterns of command signals directly triggering the device functions. This approach can be difficult to implement when there are many functions (necessitating many command patterns) and/or the user has a considerable impairment (limited number of available signal sources). In this study, we propose a novel concept for a general-purpose HMI where the controller and the user communicate bidirectionally to select the desired function. The system first presents possible choices to the user via electro-tactile stimulation; the user then acknowledges the desired choice by generating a single command signal. Therefore, the proposed approach simplifies the user communication interface (one signal to generate), decoding (one signal to recognize), and allows selecting from a number of options. To demonstrate the new concept the method was used in one particular application, namely, to implement the control of all the relevant functions in a state of the art commercial prosthetic hand without using any myoelectric channels. We performed experiments in healthy subjects and with one amputee to test the feasibility of the novel approach. The results showed that the performance of the novel HMI concept was comparable or, for some outcome measures, better than the classic myoelectric interfaces. The presented approach has a general applicability and the obtained results point out that it could be used to operate various assistive systems (e.g., prosthesis vs. wheelchair), or it could be integrated into other control schemes (e.g., myoelectric control, brain-machine interfaces) in order to improve the usability of existing low-bandwidth HMIs.

[1]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Reconstructing Three-Dimensional Hand Movements from Noninvasive Electroencephalographic Signals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  MUNDUS project: MUltimodal Neuroprosthesis for daily Upper limb Support , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Herbert F. Voigt,et al.  IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Markus Reischl,et al.  OrthoJacket: an active FES-hybrid orthosis for the paralysed upper extremity , 2011, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  G. Berns,et al.  BAD TO WORSE , 1975, The Lancet.

[7]  Andrew Y. J. Szeto,et al.  Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Jonathan Becedas,et al.  Brain–Machine Interfaces: Basis and Advances , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[9]  E. Mainardi,et al.  Controlling a prosthetic arm with a throat microphone , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Dario Farina,et al.  Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Frank A. Saunders,et al.  Electrocutaneous Stimulation for Sensory Communication in Rehabilitation Engineering , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Dario Farina,et al.  Stereovision and augmented reality for closed-loop control of grasping in hand prostheses , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  Jacob L. Segil,et al.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[16]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  A Tactile Display System for Hand Prostheses to Discriminate Pressure and Individual Finger Localization , 2010 .

[17]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Soo-Jin Lee,et al.  Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering , 2012 .

[19]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  A Noninvasive Brain-Actuated Wheelchair Based on a P300 Neurophysiological Protocol and Automated Navigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User–Prosthesis Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[21]  S. Coyle,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: a review , 2003 .

[22]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Comparison of surface and intramuscular EMG pattern recognition for simultaneous wrist/hand motion classification , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[23]  M.C. Carrozza,et al.  A novel wearable interface for robotic hand prostheses , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[24]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  HyVE—Hybrid Vibro-Electrotactile Stimulation—Is an Efficient Approach to Multi-Channel Sensory Feedback , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[25]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  A Miniature Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Device for Multifingered Hand Prosthetics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  A Decision-Based Velocity Ramp for Minimizing the Effect of Misclassifications During Real-Time Pattern Recognition Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  D. Yatsenko,et al.  Simultaneous, Proportional, Multi-axis Prosthesis Control using Multichannel Surface EMG , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  A tactile P 300 brain-computer interface , 2010 .

[30]  Alejandro Hernández Arieta,et al.  Gesture recognition in upper-limb prosthetics: A viability study using dynamic time warping and gyroscopes , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  V. Caggiano,et al.  Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Linda Resnik,et al.  The DEKA Arm: Its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[33]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces--the key for the conscious brain locked into a paralyzed body. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[35]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Toward attenuating the impact of arm positions on electromyography pattern-recognition based motion classification in transradial amputees , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[37]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  Surface Versus Untargeted Intramuscular EMG Based Classification of Simultaneous and Dynamically Changing Movements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Spatial Filtering for Robust Myoelectric Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Dejan B. Popovic,et al.  A novel hand prosthesis control scheme implementing a tongue control system , 2012 .

[40]  C Grozea,et al.  On the feasibility of using motor imagery EEG-based brain–computer interface in chronic tetraplegics for assistive robotic arm control: a clinical test and long-term post-trial follow-up , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[41]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  N. Prins Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .

[43]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: Review and discussion , 2012, Biomedical engineering online.

[44]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Hearing as substitution for sensation: a new principle for artificial sensibility. , 1999, The Journal of hand surgery.

[45]  H. Flor,et al.  Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain , 2001, The Lancet.

[46]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Vibro- and Electrotactile User Feedback on Hand Opening for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  C. Cipriani,et al.  HyVE: Hybrid Vibro-Electrotactile Stimulation for Sensory Feedback and Substitution in Rehabilitation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[48]  Dario Farina,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Myoelectric Prostheses With Electrotactile Feedback: Influence of Stimulation Artifact and Blanking , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[49]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Auditory Display as a Prosthetic Hand Biofeedback , 2011 .

[50]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  A Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[51]  D. G. Buma,et al.  Intermittent Stimulation Delays Adaptation to Electrocutaneous Sensory Feedback , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[52]  I. P. Ganin,et al.  A P300-based Brain-Computer Interface with Stimuli on Moving Objects: Four-Session Single-Trial and Triple-Trial Tests with a Game-Like Task Design , 2013, PloS one.

[53]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric control in neurorehabilitation. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[54]  K. Ikeda,et al.  Human ability to discriminate various parameters in afferent electrical nerve stimulation with particular reference to prostheses sensory feedback , 1977, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[55]  J. Webster,et al.  Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  Xin Yang,et al.  Controlling hand-assistive devices: utilizing electrooculography as a substitute for vision , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.